H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tereza Martincova vs Garbiñe Muguruza H2H: 0-1
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 1–0 lead over Tereza Martincova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2021 Moscow fourth round 6-4 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tereza Martincova | Garbiñe Muguruza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 |
| 26 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 |
| 27 | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 |
| 28 | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |