H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Timea Bacsinszky vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 1-0
Timea Bacsinszky holds a 1–0 lead over Maryna Zanevska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Timea Bacsinszky leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2014 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-1 6-4 | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Timea Bacsinszky | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |