H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Timea Bacsinszky vs Na Li H2H: 1-1

Timea Bacsinszky and Na Li are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 1–0 on clay, while Timea Bacsinszky leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2010 Miami Open second round 6-4 4-6 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Timea Bacsinszky
Switzerland Age 37 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Timea Bacsinszky #54 6-4 4-6 7-6(3) Na Li #11 Match data Mar 26, 2010* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Na Li #25 6-1 6-4 Timea Bacsinszky #127 Match data May 28, 2009* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Timea Bacsinszky #941 #9 3,157 1,935 163 141 53.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Timea Bacsinszky Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2004 0–2 0.0% #252 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 3–3 50.0% #124 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2008 13–16 44.8% #54 1,589 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2009 17–10 63.0% #53 1,739 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2010 19–21 47.5% #50 1,694 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2011 3–6 33.3% #247 1,663 0 1 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2012 2–6 25.0% #179 1,604 0 1 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 2013 0–1 0.0% #237 1,597 0 1 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 2014 11–10 52.4% #48 1,678 0 1 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1
26 2015 37–14 72.5% #12 1,845 0 3 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2
27 2016 32–19 62.7% #15 1,758 0 4 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 2017 15–9 62.5% #39 1,809 0 4 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3
29 2018 3–8 27.3% #191 1,721 0 4 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 2019 6–10 37.5% #139 1,641 0 4 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6
31 — — — — — — — 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 — — — — — — — 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Timea Bacsinszky Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 9 12 21 42.9% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
24 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2015 24 9 33 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2017 4 3 7 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
29 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2019 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 86 83 169 50.9% 66 44 110 60.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 266/303 of Timea Bacsinszky's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Timea Bacsinszky Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2006 3/6 3.7 3.3 51.7% 77.8% 56.8% 87.9% 61.7% 67.9% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 5/8 2.0 2.2 57.5% 63.2% 43.5% 44.1% 47.8% 54.5% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 25/29 2.6 3.0 55.2% 62.1% 45.0% 45.3% 40.7% 54.5% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 23/27 3.2 2.4 59.3% 64.1% 45.7% 57.5% 50.2% 56.6% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 38/40 2.3 3.7 58.8% 61.1% 45.5% 58.0% 53.3% 54.4% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 4/9 3.5 5.8 55.6% 62.9% 38.2% 59.9% 44.2% 51.9% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 8/8 0.5 2.6 66.8% 50.8% 35.6% 37.0% 43.7% 45.9% 41.9% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 2013 1/1 0.0 4.0 66.1% 51.2% 42.9% 44.4% 66.7% 48.4% 41.9% 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 2014 20/21 1.5 2.5 67.0% 62.6% 44.5% 56.6% 47.4% 56.7% 46.1% 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 2015 44/51 1.9 3.0 67.9% 63.4% 52.1% 51.8% 51.3% 59.8% 44.9% 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 2016 47/52 1.1 2.0 68.4% 62.2% 48.3% 52.0% 47.0% 57.6% 46.8% 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 2017 24/24 1.8 2.0 65.9% 62.6% 52.8% 52.0% 48.6% 59.5% 47.6% 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 2018 11/11 1.7 3.5 63.4% 61.9% 41.4% 50.7% 50.5% 54.6% 40.5% 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 2019 13/16 1.7 1.7 63.4% 59.2% 45.7% 48.6% 52.5% 54.3% 44.2% 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
Career — 266/305 1.9 2.7 63.5% 62.1% 47.2% 52.7% 49.0% 56.5% 45.1% — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Timea Bacsinszky Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2004 1485 103.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1542 116.2 +3.56 +1.88 1.400 57.0% +31 -31 — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1522 115.5 -0.18 -0.57 0.907 47.9% — -4 — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.40 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21
19 2008 1589 126.2 -0.62 +0.29 0.970 49.3% +20 -40 — 44.6% -0.45 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 -0.23 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
20 2009 1740 124.9 +0.62 +0.51 1.044 51.0% -48 -88 — 56.7% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 105.7 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 1694 127.2 -1.10 +1.16 0.983 49.6% -12 -15 — 46.6% -0.19 5–5 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 96.6 +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 1664 120.0 +0.92 +0.57 0.873 47.3% -9 — — 36.4% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.28 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
23 2012 1604 100.6 -3.34 -1.85 0.775 43.6% +16 +53 — 25.0% -1.58 1–1 0–1 — -0.15 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97
24 2013 1597 104.4 -0.12 +0.61 0.812 45.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.32 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52
25 2014 1679 141.7 +1.87 +2.26 1.066 51.2% -13 +1 — 53.3% +0.42 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 94.6 -0.84 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95
26 2015 1845 146.1 +1.78 +3.78 1.118 52.2% -20 -75 -157 64.4% +0.91 16–4 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 109.4 -1.30 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80
27 2016 1759 141.7 +1.97 +2.62 1.105 52.1% -20 +159 -87 60.0% +0.77 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 104.1 +1.27 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23
28 2017 1809 137.6 +2.69 +3.09 1.176 53.2% -61 +141 -121 66.0% +1.45 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 -0.19 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93
29 2018 1722 119.2 -1.27 -1.05 0.891 47.5% -27 — — 34.6% -1.58 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 95.4 -0.52 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26
30 2019 1642 126.3 -1.44 +0.08 0.966 49.1% +23 +199 — 42.1% -0.50 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 94.1 -0.93 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97
Career — 1936 141.2 +0.69 +1.70 1.038 50.7% -15 +35 -124 52.4% +0.21 53–45 (54%) 19–33 (37%) 96.0 -0.96 — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.