H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Timea Bacsinszky vs Richel Hogenkamp H2H: 1-0

Timea Bacsinszky holds a 1–0 lead over Richel Hogenkamp in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Timea Bacsinszky leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2015 Acapulco round of 32 2-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Timea Bacsinszky
Switzerland Age 37 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Richel Hogenkamp
The Netherlands Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Timea Bacsinszky #37 2-6 6-2 6-3 Richel Hogenkamp #125 Match data Feb 26, 2015* R32 Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Timea Bacsinszky #941 #9 3,157 1,935 163 141 53.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Richel Hogenkamp #1,297 #94 654 1,581 14 28 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Timea Bacsinszky Richel Hogenkamp
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2004 0–2 0.0% #252 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2006 3–3 50.0% #124 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 13–16 44.8% #54 1,589 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2009 17–10 63.0% #53 1,739 0 1 2012 1–1 50.0% #197 1,513 0 0
21 2010 19–21 47.5% #50 1,694 0 1 2013 2–2 50.0% #213 1,524 0 0
22 2011 3–6 33.3% #247 1,663 0 1 2014 1–1 50.0% #138 1,530 0 0
23 2012 2–6 25.0% #179 1,604 0 1 2015 2–7 22.2% #132 1,495 0 0
24 2013 0–1 0.0% #237 1,597 0 1 2016 3–3 50.0% #133 1,548 0 0
25 2014 11–10 52.4% #48 1,678 0 1 2017 5–8 38.5% #106 1,537 0 0
26 2015 37–14 72.5% #12 1,845 0 3 2018 0–5 0.0% #167 1,514 0 0
27 2016 32–19 62.7% #15 1,758 0 4 2019 0–1 0.0% #195 1,478 0 0
28 2017 15–9 62.5% #39 1,809 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2018 3–8 27.3% #191 1,721 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2019 6–10 37.5% #139 1,641 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Timea Bacsinszky Richel Hogenkamp
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2010 9 12 21 42.9% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
22 2011 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2015 24 9 33 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 4 3 7 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 86 83 169 50.9% 66 44 110 60.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — 4 13 17 23.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 266/303 of Timea Bacsinszky's and 40/42 of Richel Hogenkamp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Timea Bacsinszky Richel Hogenkamp
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2006 3/6 3.7 3.3 51.7% 77.8% 56.8% 87.9% 61.7% 67.9% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 5/8 2.0 2.2 57.5% 63.2% 43.5% 44.1% 47.8% 54.5% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 25/29 2.6 3.0 55.2% 62.1% 45.0% 45.3% 40.7% 54.5% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 23/27 3.2 2.4 59.3% 64.1% 45.7% 57.5% 50.2% 56.6% 45.3% 2012 2/2 2.0 8.5 48.8% 65.9% 48.9% 56.3% 43.2% 57.0% 36.8%
21 2010 38/40 2.3 3.7 58.8% 61.1% 45.5% 58.0% 53.3% 54.4% 44.8% 2013 3/4 1.0 6.3 57.2% 55.4% 46.8% 57.9% 78.0% 52.0% 45.5%
22 2011 4/9 3.5 5.8 55.6% 62.9% 38.2% 59.9% 44.2% 51.9% 42.0% 2014 2/2 1.5 5.5 64.9% 56.6% 37.3% 55.0% 65.3% 50.3% 48.5%
23 2012 8/8 0.5 2.6 66.8% 50.8% 35.6% 37.0% 43.7% 45.9% 41.9% 2015 8/9 0.9 3.1 59.2% 60.5% 48.0% 55.2% 51.4% 55.8% 34.4%
24 2013 1/1 0.0 4.0 66.1% 51.2% 42.9% 44.4% 66.7% 48.4% 41.9% 2016 6/6 0.8 4.8 55.6% 63.8% 49.0% 61.8% 57.0% 57.1% 45.2%
25 2014 20/21 1.5 2.5 67.0% 62.6% 44.5% 56.6% 47.4% 56.7% 46.1% 2017 13/13 1.8 2.9 59.1% 62.5% 49.4% 47.9% 42.7% 57.2% 39.2%
26 2015 44/51 1.9 3.0 67.9% 63.4% 52.1% 51.8% 51.3% 59.8% 44.9% 2018 5/5 1.0 4.0 55.4% 55.2% 40.6% 47.6% 31.3% 48.4% 34.0%
27 2016 47/52 1.1 2.0 68.4% 62.2% 48.3% 52.0% 47.0% 57.6% 46.8% 2019 1/1 0.0 4.0 61.5% 54.2% 43.3% 50.0% 42.9% 50.0% 43.3%
28 2017 24/24 1.8 2.0 65.9% 62.6% 52.8% 52.0% 48.6% 59.5% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 11/11 1.7 3.5 63.4% 61.9% 41.4% 50.7% 50.5% 54.6% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 13/16 1.7 1.7 63.4% 59.2% 45.7% 48.6% 52.5% 54.3% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266/305 1.9 2.7 63.5% 62.1% 47.2% 52.7% 49.0% 56.5% 45.1% — 40/42 1.3 4.1 57.8% 60.5% 47.0% 53.0% 49.0% 54.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Timea Bacsinszky Richel Hogenkamp
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2004 1485 103.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1542 116.2 +3.56 +1.88 1.400 57.0% +31 -31 — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1522 115.5 -0.18 -0.57 0.907 47.9% — -4 — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1589 126.2 -0.62 +0.29 0.970 49.3% +20 -40 — 44.6% -0.45 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 1740 124.9 +0.62 +0.51 1.044 51.0% -48 -88 — 56.7% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 105.7 +0.19 2012 1513 105.3 +0.72 -1.37 0.857 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — -0.17
21 2010 1694 127.2 -1.10 +1.16 0.983 49.6% -12 -15 — 46.6% -0.19 5–5 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 96.6 +1.27 2013 1525 101.1 -1.26 -0.60 0.947 49.5% — +62 — 44.4% -0.45 1–0 — — +0.05
22 2011 1664 120.0 +0.92 +0.57 0.873 47.3% -9 — — 36.4% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.28 2014 1530 104.8 -1.97 -1.72 0.975 49.3% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01
23 2012 1604 100.6 -3.34 -1.85 0.775 43.6% +16 +53 — 25.0% -1.58 1–1 0–1 — -0.15 2015 1496 108.3 -1.68 -2.17 0.778 45.4% -26 +70 — 26.3% -1.68 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.22
24 2013 1597 104.4 -0.12 +0.61 0.812 45.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.32 2016 1549 112.0 -0.08 +0.20 1.052 51.5% — — — 57.1% +0.50 0–2 — — -0.05
25 2014 1679 141.7 +1.87 +2.26 1.066 51.2% -13 +1 — 53.3% +0.42 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 94.6 -0.84 2017 1538 106.6 +0.40 -2.44 0.917 48.4% -45 — +57 39.3% -0.64 1–1 0–2 — -0.12
26 2015 1845 146.1 +1.78 +3.78 1.118 52.2% -20 -75 -157 64.4% +0.91 16–4 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 109.4 -1.30 2018 1514 95.9 -2.74 -3.00 0.659 41.5% — +56 — 9.1% -3.36 0–1 0–2 — -0.20
27 2016 1759 141.7 +1.97 +2.62 1.105 52.1% -20 +159 -87 60.0% +0.77 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 104.1 +1.27 2019 1479 104.6 +0.93 +3.09 0.867 46.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.12
28 2017 1809 137.6 +2.69 +3.09 1.176 53.2% -61 +141 -121 66.0% +1.45 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 -0.19 2020 1482 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1722 119.2 -1.27 -1.05 0.891 47.5% -27 — — 34.6% -1.58 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 95.4 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1642 126.3 -1.44 +0.08 0.966 49.1% +23 +199 — 42.1% -0.50 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 94.1 -0.93 2022 1468 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1936 141.2 +0.69 +1.70 1.038 50.7% -15 +35 -124 52.4% +0.21 53–45 (54%) 19–33 (37%) 96.0 -0.96 — 1581 108.2 -0.69 -1.69 0.874 47.4% -39 +63 +57 35.9% -0.98 3–5 (38%) 0–8 (0%) 92.3 -1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.