H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Varvara Lepchenko vs Na Lae Han H2H: 1-0
Varvara Lepchenko holds a 1–0 lead over Na Lae Han in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Varvara Lepchenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Varvara Lepchenko won the 2014 Seoul fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2014* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Varvara Lepchenko | 7-5 6-1 | Na Lae Han | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varvara Lepchenko | #172 | #19 | 1,875 | 1,804 | 155 | 220 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Na Lae Han | #973 | #149 | 416 | 1,517 | 5 | 14 | 26.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Varvara Lepchenko | Na Lae Han | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #132 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #256 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #102 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #74 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #54 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #47 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #90 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #129 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #173 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #127 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |