H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Viktorija Golubic vs Rebeka Masarova H2H: 1-1
Viktorija Golubic and Rebeka Masarova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Viktorija Golubic leads 1–0 on clay, while Rebeka Masarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebeka Masarova won the 2023 Guangzhou fourth round 6-1 3-6 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 26
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2023* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Rebeka Masarova | 6-1 3-6 7-6(7) | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2016* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Viktorija Golubic | 6-3 6-2 | Rebeka Masarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Rebeka Masarova | #166 | #62 | 982 | 1,799 | 37 | 46 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Viktorija Golubic | Rebeka Masarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #311 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #116 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #166 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |