H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Vitalia Diatchenko vs Kurumi Nara H2H: 0-1
Kurumi Nara holds a 1–0 lead over Vitalia Diatchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kurumi Nara leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kurumi Nara won the 2015 Istanbul third round 6-4 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2015* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kurumi Nara | 6-4 7-6(7) | Vitalia Diatchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitalia Diatchenko | #438 | #71 | 791 | 1,624 | 14 | 49 | 22.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Vitalia Diatchenko | Kurumi Nara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #133 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #130 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #81 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #90 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #137 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #179 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |