H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Xinyu Wang vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 2-0
Xinyu Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Xinyu Wang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Xinyu Wang won the 2025 Singapore quarterfinal 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 24
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2025 | Singapore | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Xinyu Wang | 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-4 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Sep 14, 2023* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Xinyu Wang | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyu Wang | #40 | #30 | 1,581 | 1,857 | 105 | 121 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Xinyu Wang | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #86 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2025 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #40 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |