H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:17 UTC
Xinyu Wang vs Rebeka Masarova H2H: 1-2
Rebeka Masarova holds a 2–1 lead over Xinyu Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rebeka Masarova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebeka Masarova won the 2026 Austin third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 24
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 26
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2026 | Austin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Rebeka Masarova | 6-3 6-2 | Xinyu Wang | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2026 | Cluj-Napoca | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Xinyu Wang | 6-4 6-2 | Rebeka Masarova | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2024* | Hua Hin 2 | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Rebeka Masarova | 7-6(6) 3-6 7-5 | Xinyu Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyu Wang | #40 | #30 | 1,581 | 1,857 | 105 | 121 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rebeka Masarova | #166 | #62 | 982 | 1,799 | 37 | 46 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Xinyu Wang | Rebeka Masarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #311 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #86 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #40 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #116 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #166 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |