H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Xiyu Wang vs Ana Bogdan H2H: 2-0
Xiyu Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Ana Bogdan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Xiyu Wang leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Xiyu Wang won the 2024 Madrid first round 6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 25
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2024* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Xiyu Wang | 6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-2 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2022* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Xiyu Wang | 7-6(2) 7-6(10) | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiyu Wang | #89 | #49 | 1,199 | 1,776 | 66 | 88 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Xiyu Wang | Ana Bogdan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #639 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #209 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #50 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #70 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #175 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #89 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |