H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Yafan Wang vs Kai-Chen Chang H2H: 1-0
Yafan Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yafan Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yafan Wang won the 2017 Nanchang fourth round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2017* | Nanchang | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Yafan Wang | 6-0 6-2 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yafan Wang | #358 | #47 | 1,185 | 1,784 | 71 | 89 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yafan Wang | Kai-Chen Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #180 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #309 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |