H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Yingying Duan vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 1-1
Yingying Duan and Zarina Diyas are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Zarina Diyas won the 2020 Shenzhen third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2020* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Zarina Diyas | 6-3 6-4 | Yingying Duan | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2017* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yingying Duan | 7-5 6-3 | Zarina Diyas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yingying Duan | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |