H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Ysaline Bonaventure vs Samantha Crawford H2H: 0-1
Samantha Crawford holds a 1–0 lead over Ysaline Bonaventure in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Samantha Crawford leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Samantha Crawford won the 2016 Quebec City third round 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 31
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2016* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Samantha Crawford | 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 | Ysaline Bonaventure | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ysaline Bonaventure | #939 | #81 | 746 | 1,711 | 28 | 50 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samantha Crawford | #1,084 | #98 | 677 | 1,599 | 8 | 16 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ysaline Bonaventure | Samantha Crawford | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #229 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #341 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #117 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #235 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #189 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |