H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Yulia Putintseva vs Anna Karolina Schmiedlova H2H: 2-1
Yulia Putintseva holds a 2–1 lead over Anna Karolina Schmiedlova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Yulia Putintseva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yulia Putintseva won the 2022 Budapest third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2022* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 6-4 6-1 | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2018* | Hiroshima | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 6-2 0-0 (ret.) | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2016* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 6-2 6-4 | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | #379 | #26 | 1,875 | 1,792 | 115 | 162 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yulia Putintseva | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #83 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #73 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–22 | 12.0% | #227 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |