H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Yulia Putintseva vs Garbiñe Muguruza H2H: 2-2
Yulia Putintseva and Garbiñe Muguruza are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Yulia Putintseva leads 2–1 on clay, while Garbiñe Muguruza leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yulia Putintseva won the 2022 Rome third round 3-6 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2022* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
| Apr 9, 2021* | Charleston 1 | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 0-6 2-2 (ret.) | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Garbiñe Muguruza | 7-5 6-2 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2016 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-2 7-6(5) | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yulia Putintseva | Garbiñe Muguruza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 |
| 24 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 |
| 25 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 |
| 26 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 |
| 28 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 |
| 30 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |