H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Ana Bogdan vs Shelby Rogers H2H: 1-1
Ana Bogdan and Shelby Rogers are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shelby Rogers leads 1–0 on clay, while Ana Bogdan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shelby Rogers won the 2023 Madrid second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2024 | Cleveland | WTA 250 | Q1 | Hard | Ana Bogdan | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-1 | Shelby Rogers | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2023* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Shelby Rogers | 6-2 6-2 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2023* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ana Bogdan | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Shelby Rogers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Shelby Rogers | #437 | #30 | 1,698 | 1,875 | 126 | 138 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Bogdan | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #630 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #149 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #341 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |