H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Ivana Lisjak H2H: 0-1

Ivana Lisjak holds a 1–0 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivana Lisjak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivana Lisjak won the 2006 Morocco Open round of 32 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ivana Lisjak
CRO Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivana Lisjak #110 6-2 6-1 Anastasia Rodionova #108 Match data May 18, 2006* R32 Morocco Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ivana Lisjak #1,266 #95 286 1,550 8 15 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Ivana Lisjak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% #227 1,519 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 2005 2–3 40.0% #134 1,523 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0 2006 4–8 33.3% #125 1,504 0 0
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #207 1,497 0 0
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0 2009 1–1 50.0% #213 1,510 0 0
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #240 1,500 0 0
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Ivana Lisjak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — 4 8 12 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Ivana Lisjak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1520 104.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–2 — -0.36
18 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 2005 1523 103.7 -0.62 -0.07 0.788 44.7% -3 — — 41.7% -0.58 1–1 0–1 — +0.26
19 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01 2006 1504 110.4 -2.55 -3.33 0.781 44.8% -20 +94 — 33.3% -1.17 — 1–4 (20%) — +0.55
20 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66 2007 1498 103.6 -1.43 +0.96 0.809 44.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.23
21 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2009 1511 106.1 -1.20 -2.06 0.940 49.2% — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.11
23 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62 2010 1500 — -1.38 +0.29 0.569 40.3% — — — — — — — — -0.05
24 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19 — 1550 110.6 -1.87 -2.02 0.791 45.1% -12 +94 — 36.7% -0.84 3–2 (60%) 1–7 (13%) 97.4 +0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.