H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Anett Kontaveit vs Bianca Andreescu H2H: 3-0
Anett Kontaveit holds a 3–0 lead over Bianca Andreescu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anett Kontaveit leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2021 Indian Wells third round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 26
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Bianca Andreescu | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2021* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Anett Kontaveit | 6-3 6-3 | Bianca Andreescu | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2019* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-1 2-0 (ret.) | Bianca Andreescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Bianca Andreescu | #173 | #4 | 5,331 | 2,042 | 107 | 75 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Bianca Andreescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #185 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 35–8 | 81.4% | #5 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #46 | 1,855 | 1 | 3 |
| 22 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #46 | 1,904 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #95 | 1,780 | 1 | 3 |
| 24 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #132 | 1,776 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #228 | 1,727 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,712 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |