H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Anna Kalinskaya vs Kai-Chen Chang H2H: 1-0
Anna Kalinskaya holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Kalinskaya leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Kalinskaya won the 2017 Istanbul third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2017* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anna Kalinskaya | 6-1 6-3 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Kalinskaya | #20 | #11 | 2,975 | 1,957 | 134 | 122 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna Kalinskaya | Kai-Chen Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2017 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #114 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #111 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,885 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,903 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |