H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Arina Rodionova vs Yingying Duan H2H: 1-0
Arina Rodionova holds a 1–0 lead over Yingying Duan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arina Rodionova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arina Rodionova won the 2017 Nanchang third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2017* | Nanchang | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Arina Rodionova | 7-5 6-4 | Yingying Duan | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2017 | Sydney | WTA 500 | Q3 | Hard | Yingying Duan | 4-6 7-5 7-6(2) | Arina Rodionova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arina Rodionova | #439 | #97 | 761 | 1,560 | 17 | 46 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Arina Rodionova | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #152 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |