H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Aryna Sabalenka vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 2-0
Aryna Sabalenka holds a 2–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aryna Sabalenka leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aryna Sabalenka won the 2025 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 28
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2025 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Aryna Sabalenka | 6-3 6-1 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2022* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Aryna Sabalenka | 6-2 6-1 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | #1 | #1 | 12,420 | 2,323 | 399 | 138 | 74.3% | 4 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 24 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aryna Sabalenka | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #96 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,936 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 28–9 | 75.7% | #10 | 2,005 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #2 | 1,986 | 0 | 10 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #5 | 1,956 | 0 | 10 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2024 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,170 | 3 | 17 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #1 | 2,225 | 4 | 21 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 36–6 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,214 | 4 | 24 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |