H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Aryna Sabalenka vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 2-1
Aryna Sabalenka holds a 2–1 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Aryna Sabalenka leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Aryna Sabalenka won the 2020 Doha quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 28
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2020* | Doha | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Aryna Sabalenka | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2019* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Aryna Sabalenka | 6-4 6-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Aug 4, 2019* | San Jose | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 6-3 7-6(3) | Aryna Sabalenka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | #1 | #1 | 12,420 | 2,323 | 399 | 138 | 74.3% | 4 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 24 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Aryna Sabalenka | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2017 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #96 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,936 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 28–9 | 75.7% | #10 | 2,005 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #2 | 1,986 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #5 | 1,956 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,170 | 3 | 17 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #1 | 2,225 | 4 | 21 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 36–6 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,214 | 4 | 24 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |