H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Asia Muhammad vs Shelby Rogers H2H: 0-1
Shelby Rogers holds a 1–0 lead over Asia Muhammad in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shelby Rogers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shelby Rogers won the 2014 Quebec City fourth round 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 35
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2014* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Shelby Rogers | 6-7(5) 7-6(2) 7-6(5) | Asia Muhammad | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asia Muhammad | #839 | #124 | 461 | 1,555 | 4 | 18 | 18.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shelby Rogers | #437 | #30 | 1,698 | 1,875 | 126 | 138 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Asia Muhammad | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #613 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #630 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #217 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #149 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #341 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #365 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |