H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Barbora Strycova vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-0
Barbora Strycova holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Strycova won the 2015 US Open second round 6-2 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Barbora Strycova | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Strycova | #430 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,888 | 286 | 297 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbora Strycova | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #57 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #137 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #151 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #66 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #44 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #89 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #25 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #33 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #37 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #430 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |