H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Jil Teichmann.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | 6-2 6-2 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data | Apr 28, 2019 | Q2 | Prague Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #154 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,939 | 148 | 136 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Jil Teichmann | #175 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,882 | 94 | 104 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #17 | 1,889 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #175 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,536 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2019 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2021 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2022 | 19 | 16 | 35 | 54.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 13 | 2 | 15 | 86.7% | 2024 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2025 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2024 | 24 | 16 | 40 | 60.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 88 | 88 | 176 | 50.0% | 34 | 32 | 66 | 51.5% | 26 | 16 | 42 | 61.9% | — | 50 | 61 | 111 | 45.0% | 43 | 34 | 77 | 55.8% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 267/284 of Beatriz Haddad Maia's and 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2013 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 67.4% | 65.8% | 49.0% | 81.8% | 62.7% | 60.5% | 47.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 67.9% | 54.9% | 17.6% | 48.8% | 31.3% | 43.0% | 37.4% | 2016 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 44.3% | 70.9% | 50.5% | 63.5% | 54.2% | 59.3% | 41.6% |
| 19 | 2015 | 5/5 | 3.4 | 1.8 | 59.9% | 67.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 41.6% | 62.9% | 50.2% | 2017 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 53.5% | 55.0% | 40.6% | 31.7% | 45.4% | 47.4% | 34.9% |
| 20 | 2016 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 7.3 | 58.4% | 58.0% | 29.2% | 44.6% | 40.3% | 45.7% | 36.2% | 2018 | 9/9 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 62.4% | 69.7% | 44.8% | 55.3% | 38.8% | 60.4% | 39.6% |
| 21 | 2017 | 26/26 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 68.1% | 65.7% | 47.9% | 57.3% | 43.6% | 60.1% | 42.2% | 2019 | 22/22 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 63.6% | 64.4% | 50.3% | 57.3% | 52.8% | 59.2% | 45.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 14/14 | 1.7 | 4.2 | 65.1% | 63.5% | 40.5% | 38.9% | 52.0% | 55.5% | 40.0% | 2020 | 20/21 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 62.6% | 64.0% | 49.0% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.2% | 45.6% |
| 23 | 2019 | 12/12 | 2.1 | 4.9 | 72.9% | 65.6% | 47.3% | 68.8% | 38.1% | 60.3% | 42.3% | 2021 | 40/43 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 59.1% | 63.8% | 48.7% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 57.5% | 43.2% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 40/40 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 60.3% | 63.7% | 45.7% | 52.8% | 49.0% | 56.3% | 42.6% |
| 25 | 2021 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 62.1% | 57.5% | 39.1% | 50.8% | 48.2% | 50.3% | 44.4% | 2023 | 27/27 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 59.7% | 61.7% | 43.4% | 48.4% | 44.7% | 54.6% | 41.2% |
| 26 | 2022 | 51/55 | 2.9 | 4.1 | 64.9% | 67.4% | 46.8% | 57.2% | 43.8% | 60.3% | 41.5% | 2024 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 64.1% | 60.7% | 40.1% | 31.7% | 51.0% | 52.6% | 50.8% |
| 27 | 2023 | 52/53 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 69.4% | 63.5% | 49.6% | 54.2% | 45.7% | 59.4% | 42.7% | 2025 | 8/17 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 63.6% | 58.2% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 29.0% | 50.2% | 35.5% |
| 28 | 2024 | 57/59 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 64.0% | 66.5% | 47.2% | 56.4% | 50.9% | 59.4% | 43.3% | 2026 | 8/8 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 67.7% | 58.6% | 50.2% | 52.7% | 47.9% | 56.0% | 45.9% |
| 29 | 2025 | 28/38 | 2.2 | 5.0 | 64.6% | 62.1% | 43.4% | 51.9% | 39.3% | 55.3% | 41.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 11/11 | 0.9 | 5.5 | 63.2% | 56.8% | 30.5% | 41.9% | 35.3% | 47.5% | 38.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 267/284 | 2.2 | 3.8 | 66.0% | 64.7% | 45.9% | 54.6% | 45.1% | 58.2% | 42.1% | — | 184/198 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 60.9% | 63.2% | 46.4% | 52.8% | 46.6% | 56.5% | 42.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1501 | 105.4 | -1.64 | -0.18 | 1.211 | 55.0% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +1.80 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1475 | 92.2 | -4.60 | -4.21 | 0.656 | 40.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | +0.07 | 2016 | 1524 | 100.0 | +0.12 | +0.08 | 1.022 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 |
| 19 | 2015 | 1509 | 112.3 | +3.07 | +1.80 | 1.352 | 55.7% | — | +60 | — | 66.7% | +1.33 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.11 | 2017 | 1523 | 105.8 | -2.24 | -1.97 | 0.664 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.23 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1460 | 88.8 | -3.89 | -3.72 | 0.667 | 40.8% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.37 | 2018 | 1533 | 114.7 | +2.45 | -2.19 | 1.002 | 49.7% | +16 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.15 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.57 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1658 | 123.3 | +3.22 | -1.30 | 1.058 | 51.2% | -37 | -29 | -31 | 55.0% | +0.32 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–3 (57%) | 95.7 | -0.58 | 2019 | 1610 | 121.1 | +1.59 | +1.12 | 1.104 | 52.0% | -95 | +168 | — | 53.1% | +0.16 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.11 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1579 | 120.0 | -0.85 | -2.40 | 0.899 | 47.7% | +10 | — | — | 41.4% | -0.62 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.9 | -0.26 | 2020 | 1672 | 133.5 | +0.65 | +1.84 | 1.092 | 51.6% | -40 | +83 | — | 51.1% | +0.29 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.20 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1672 | 123.2 | +2.60 | -1.74 | 1.063 | 51.7% | -10 | -26 | — | 58.6% | +0.72 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.0 | 0.00 | 2021 | 1777 | 147.8 | +1.29 | +1.02 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +25 | -71 | — | 54.4% | +0.13 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.0 | -0.26 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1694 | 140.7 | -0.18 | +0.52 | 0.976 | 49.5% | -3 | +179 | -208 | 49.4% | +0.03 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.6 | -0.06 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1635 | 117.7 | -2.24 | +2.12 | 0.893 | 47.8% | +29 | — | — | 55.6% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 | 2023 | 1626 | 126.4 | -0.88 | -1.70 | 0.908 | 48.0% | +59 | +76 | -120 | 40.9% | -0.68 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 90.9 | +0.06 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1830 | 142.7 | +2.95 | -0.63 | 1.044 | 50.8% | -55 | -59 | +126 | 53.6% | +0.22 | 16–7 (70%) | 9–2 (82%) | 112.2 | +0.02 | 2024 | 1617 | 107.3 | -1.72 | +1.68 | 1.072 | 51.5% | -24 | — | — | 55.6% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1895 | 151.9 | +3.13 | +0.69 | 1.052 | 50.8% | -30 | +20 | +20 | 55.7% | +0.41 | 16–8 (67%) | 15–11 (58%) | 107.1 | -0.54 | 2025 | 1648 | 117.6 | -2.75 | -3.33 | 0.712 | 42.6% | +30 | +36 | — | 44.7% | -0.79 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.4 | -0.29 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1889 | 148.0 | +2.61 | +0.61 | 1.067 | 51.4% | +4 | -23 | +13 | 57.3% | +0.50 | 10–9 (53%) | 7–4 (64%) | 101.7 | +1.85 | 2026 | 1708 | 124.4 | +0.10 | +2.08 | 1.042 | 51.0% | — | +59 | — | 70.6% | +0.94 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.30 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1768 | 129.5 | -1.12 | -1.17 | 0.918 | 48.1% | -32 | +50 | +113 | 44.6% | -0.42 | 7–9 (44%) | 6–7 (46%) | 95.9 | +1.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 1536 | 108.1 | -5.44 | -3.77 | 0.737 | 43.0% | +44 | +132 | — | 15.4% | -2.46 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | 93.5 | +0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1939 | 140.7 | +1.71 | -0.47 | 1.009 | 50.1% | -20 | +8 | +75 | 51.2% | +0.07 | 56–52 (52%) | 47–38 (55%) | 101.6 | +1.23 | — | 1883 | 134.4 | +0.29 | +0.25 | 0.986 | 49.7% | +5 | +91 | -158 | 49.2% | -0.12 | 24–35 (41%) | 23–29 (44%) | 92.9 | -0.64 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marie Bouzkova | 4 | 2 | 6 | Aug 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Katie Boulter | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Emma Navarro | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jun 11, 2025 | H2H |
| Magdalena Frech | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 9, 2025 | H2H |
| Veronika Kudermetova | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jan 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 17, 2022 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 2022 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 29, 2026 | H2H |