H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Camila Giorgi vs Qiang Wang H2H: 3-0

Camila Giorgi holds a 3–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Camila Giorgi leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2019 New York semifinal 4-6 6-4 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Giorgi
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camila Giorgi #58 4-6 6-4 7-6(6) Qiang Wang #18 Match data Aug 24, 2019* SF New York International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Camila Giorgi #99 4-6 6-3 6-2 Qiang Wang #57 Match data May 4, 2017* R16 Prague Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Camila Giorgi #81 6-0 6-2 Qiang Wang #71 Match data Jan 6, 2017* QF Shenzhen International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,899 211 188 52.9% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Giorgi Qiang Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,523 0 0 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0
21 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,578 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0
22 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,709 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0
23 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,727 0 1 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0
24 2016 16–20 44.4% #82 1,645 0 1 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0
25 2017 15–13 53.6% #78 1,759 0 1 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0
26 2018 29–16 64.4% #26 1,866 0 2 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2
27 2019 13–15 46.4% #100 1,749 0 2 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2
28 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,736 0 2 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2
29 2021 24–17 58.5% #33 1,829 0 3 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2
30 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,769 0 3 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2
31 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,790 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,762 0 4 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camila Giorgi Qiang Wang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2013 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2014 17 11 28 60.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2015 17 15 32 53.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2016 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2018 15 9 24 62.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2019 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
29 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
30 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 2023 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 131 117 248 52.8% 38 40 78 48.7% 42 31 73 57.5% — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Camila Giorgi Qiang Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 7.0 53.3% 66.7% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 48.9% 26.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 16/16 1.7 7.4 53.8% 66.1% 42.4% 53.5% 42.4% 55.1% 43.4% 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9%
21 2013 16/19 2.0 7.7 56.3% 63.1% 45.2% 50.3% 46.6% 54.9% 42.7% 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6%
22 2014 44/46 3.2 8.2 53.9% 70.1% 49.0% 53.4% 44.4% 60.3% 43.8% 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1%
23 2015 36/47 3.1 10.5 60.2% 68.8% 54.7% 56.5% 54.2% 63.0% 41.9% 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0%
24 2016 32/37 2.0 6.9 56.7% 62.8% 45.8% 51.5% 46.0% 55.4% 42.1% 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6%
25 2017 27/28 2.9 6.5 56.0% 64.5% 47.9% 50.1% 45.3% 57.4% 42.1% 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3%
26 2018 43/45 3.5 5.0 59.2% 67.0% 49.8% 51.2% 49.9% 60.1% 44.6% 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4%
27 2019 25/28 2.7 6.0 55.8% 62.6% 46.0% 48.7% 52.2% 55.2% 44.3% 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6%
28 2020 19/19 2.7 6.7 56.5% 64.6% 47.6% 49.2% 45.0% 57.4% 41.2% 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6%
29 2021 34/41 3.5 6.8 54.2% 67.0% 48.5% 46.3% 49.1% 58.5% 44.1% 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9%
30 2022 30/30 2.4 7.3 54.3% 66.8% 44.8% 45.9% 48.2% 56.7% 43.5% 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6%
31 2023 35/35 3.0 6.3 56.0% 67.8% 45.8% 56.8% 46.0% 58.2% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 8/8 3.8 7.0 54.0% 68.3% 42.3% 64.2% 47.5% 56.5% 37.4% 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5%
Career — 366/400 2.9 7.1 56.2% 66.5% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 58.2% 43.2% — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camila Giorgi Qiang Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2011 1486 95.9 -1.46 -1.61 0.519 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 1524 109.2 -0.06 -0.52 0.966 49.3% -40 — +152 37.5% -0.78 0–2 1–1 — +0.04 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34
21 2013 1578 118.6 -0.28 -0.45 0.945 49.0% -55 -44 +82 45.2% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -0.04 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12
22 2014 1710 139.3 +3.53 +0.42 1.105 51.9% -5 -132 +5 57.3% +0.60 9–11 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 101.9 +0.57 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36
23 2015 1728 132.8 +4.03 +0.45 1.135 52.6% -8 -203 +75 51.9% +0.18 10–8 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -0.69 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30
24 2016 1645 130.4 -0.24 -0.73 0.944 49.0% +10 -57 +63 44.9% -0.37 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -2.53 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52
25 2017 1760 124.4 +1.05 -0.11 0.987 50.1% -52 -146 +35 49.3% +0.18 10–3 (77%) 5–7 (42%) 106.2 -1.25 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59
26 2018 1866 142.2 +3.05 +1.65 1.117 52.4% -27 -140 -22 61.6% +0.82 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.5 -0.86 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43
27 2019 1750 138.4 -0.54 +0.95 0.989 49.8% +3 — — 50.8% +0.24 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 95.3 -0.70 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10
28 2020 1737 130.8 +0.83 -1.43 0.968 49.3% +18 -34 — 53.2% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 -0.95 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36
29 2021 1829 139.7 +1.63 +1.37 1.062 51.2% -14 -167 +30 57.8% +0.65 8–4 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.02 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25
30 2022 1770 135.5 +0.11 +1.41 1.004 50.0% 0 -96 +100 52.1% +0.13 4–9 (31%) 3–5 (38%) 93.9 +0.10 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05
31 2023 1791 142.9 +1.46 +1.59 1.078 51.6% +17 -99 +67 59.7% +0.61 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.9 -1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1762 129.7 +0.86 -0.25 0.860 47.5% +11 — — 42.1% -0.68 1–2 (33%) — — -1.16 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38
Career — 1900 141.2 +1.54 +0.55 1.033 50.7% -8 -112 +54 52.9% +0.22 66–68 (49%) 56–41 (58%) 104.4 -2.43 — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.