H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Carla Suárez Navarro vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-0
Carla Suárez Navarro holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carla Suárez Navarro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carla Suárez Navarro won the 2016 Roland Garros second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 37
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Carla Suárez Navarro | 6-1 6-3 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carla Suárez Navarro | #342 | #6 | 4,015 | 2,022 | 339 | 247 | 57.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Carla Suárez Navarro | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #17 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |