H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Caroline Garcia vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-1

Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Caroline Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2017 Madrid Open first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Caroline Garcia
France Age 32 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #64 6-4 6-3 Caroline Garcia #23 Match data May 8, 2017 R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Caroline Garcia #452 #4 5,170 2,002 337 268 55.7% 0 3 1 0 7 11
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Caroline Garcia Qiang Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 2–4 33.3% #142 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–6 14.3% #154 1,445 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 8–14 36.4% #74 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2014 24–23 51.1% #37 1,662 0 1 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0
21 2015 28–24 53.8% #34 1,706 0 1 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0
22 2016 32–24 57.1% #24 1,744 0 3 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0
23 2017 48–22 68.6% #8 1,974 0 5 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0
24 2018 39–22 63.9% #19 1,922 0 6 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0
25 2019 24–24 50.0% #46 1,719 0 7 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0
26 2020 11–11 50.0% #43 1,745 0 7 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2
27 2021 21–24 46.7% #74 1,694 0 7 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2
28 2022 44–20 68.8% #4 1,984 0 11 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2
29 2023 36–26 58.1% #20 1,832 0 11 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2
30 2024 15–15 50.0% #48 1,763 0 11 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2
31 2025 4–9 30.8% #304 1,723 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Caroline Garcia Qiang Wang
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 12 15 27 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 21 16 37 56.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 19 17 36 52.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 30 14 44 68.2% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2018 24 15 39 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2021 12 16 28 42.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2022 23 14 37 62.2% 11 3 14 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2023 26 19 45 57.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — —
30 2024 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2025 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 201 181 382 52.6% 92 62 154 59.7% 44 24 68 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 568/605 of Caroline Garcia's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Caroline Garcia Qiang Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 6/6 4.8 6.8 56.1% 65.4% 41.9% 59.0% 47.0% 55.5% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 7/7 3.1 8.6 53.2% 69.6% 38.1% 46.5% 51.6% 54.7% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 19/22 4.5 5.2 58.7% 66.4% 44.4% 53.4% 39.9% 57.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 43/47 3.7 4.2 59.0% 65.3% 46.8% 53.2% 37.7% 57.7% 39.9% 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9%
21 2015 43/52 4.3 4.2 65.3% 67.1% 54.0% 53.7% 49.4% 62.2% 38.3% 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6%
22 2016 48/56 4.1 2.9 60.5% 65.9% 50.1% 48.2% 44.0% 59.7% 41.3% 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1%
23 2017 66/70 5.0 2.9 63.6% 67.4% 50.7% 56.8% 46.3% 61.4% 42.6% 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0%
24 2018 60/61 4.1 2.2 67.1% 65.9% 52.1% 57.7% 47.2% 61.4% 41.3% 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6%
25 2019 48/48 4.0 2.1 67.3% 64.4% 50.8% 55.3% 43.5% 59.7% 39.7% 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3%
26 2020 22/22 3.5 2.9 62.0% 63.6% 48.2% 57.3% 43.1% 57.5% 39.4% 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4%
27 2021 44/45 3.8 2.7 62.5% 62.9% 49.4% 53.2% 46.8% 57.8% 40.8% 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6%
28 2022 63/64 6.4 3.1 60.9% 71.6% 48.8% 60.0% 49.2% 62.6% 39.9% 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6%
29 2023 62/62 7.3 3.3 60.2% 72.6% 49.5% 63.5% 42.9% 63.4% 38.5% 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9%
30 2024 28/30 7.4 3.4 59.1% 71.5% 45.7% 56.9% 41.2% 61.0% 38.2% 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6%
31 2025 9/13 3.6 2.1 60.1% 60.1% 43.7% 44.1% 49.0% 53.8% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5%
Career — 568/605 4.9 3.2 62.3% 67.3% 49.4% 55.9% 45.1% 60.4% 40.0% — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Caroline Garcia Qiang Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1481 101.2 -0.19 -2.02 0.913 48.6% +22 — — 43.8% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1445 110.6 -0.32 -1.39 0.894 47.7% +27 — — 29.4% -0.88 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.9 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1482 118.4 +1.16 -4.52 0.853 47.3% +6 +27 — 43.1% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 94.0 +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1663 133.8 +1.54 -2.76 0.944 49.0% -72 +18 -59 47.6% -0.30 9–6 (60%) 10–4 (71%) 110.4 -0.60 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34
21 2015 1707 139.3 +3.93 -2.34 1.013 50.3% +9 -53 -109 52.5% +0.25 8–12 (40%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -0.37 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12
22 2016 1744 133.4 +3.27 -1.52 1.024 50.5% -17 -73 -40 53.9% +0.16 11–9 (55%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -0.69 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36
23 2017 1974 148.7 +4.65 -0.54 1.105 52.2% -2 -211 -177 62.7% +0.87 16–5 (76%) 12–9 (57%) 110.2 +0.32 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30
24 2018 1923 152.6 +4.38 -0.48 1.070 51.3% +7 -19 -150 60.4% +0.59 13–8 (62%) 7–12 (37%) 99.7 -0.23 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52
25 2019 1719 131.2 +2.32 -2.18 0.987 49.9% +13 +100 +151 47.3% -0.06 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +0.62 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59
26 2020 1746 124.7 +0.99 -2.03 0.927 48.5% -43 +95 — 47.2% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.44 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43
27 2021 1694 129.7 +0.83 -1.96 0.965 49.5% -2 +114 +171 46.6% -0.36 7–6 (54%) 6–3 (67%) 103.5 +0.68 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10
28 2022 1985 150.7 +5.57 -1.70 1.069 51.6% -48 -49 +11 63.0% +0.79 16–6 (73%) 12–15 (44%) 104.3 -0.40 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36
29 2023 1832 148.1 +5.79 -3.68 1.052 51.1% +23 +46 +145 57.2% +0.39 12–11 (52%) 11–11 (50%) 97.2 +4.38 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25
30 2024 1764 138.5 +3.01 -3.41 0.979 49.7% +38 +75 — 47.0% -0.20 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 +0.58 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05
31 2025 1724 135.4 -1.26 -0.80 0.832 46.2% +37 — — 34.5% -0.97 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38
Career — 2003 145.7 +3.40 -2.00 1.011 50.4% -5 -5 +3 53.4% +0.18 117–90 (57%) 94–87 (52%) 104.3 +0.92 — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.