H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-1
Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Caroline Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2017 Madrid second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2017 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Qiang Wang | 6-4 6-3 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Caroline Garcia | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |