H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Chloe Paquet vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 1-0
Chloe Paquet holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chloe Paquet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chloe Paquet won the 2024 Palermo third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2024* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Chloe Paquet | 6-3 6-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chloe Paquet | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |