H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Coco Gauff vs Qiang Wang H2H: 3-1

Coco Gauff holds a 3–1 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2022 Miami Open second round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Gauff
United States Age 22 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Gauff #17 7-5 6-4 Qiang Wang #101 Match data Mar 25, 2022* R64 Miami Open WTA 1000 Hard
Qiang Wang #110 6-4 6-2 Coco Gauff #16 Match data Jan 19, 2022* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Coco Gauff #25 6-3 7-6(1) Qiang Wang #39 Match data Jun 2, 2021* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Coco Gauff #30 6-1 6-3 Qiang Wang #48 Match data May 23, 2021* F Parma WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Gauff #4 #2 8,173 2,176 285 113 71.6% 2 4 1 1 4 12
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Gauff Qiang Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2019 11–5 68.8% #68 1,693 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 2020 10–8 55.6% #48 1,782 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 2021 35–16 68.6% #22 1,897 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 2022 38–22 63.3% #7 1,927 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2023 51–16 76.1% #3 2,107 1 6 — — — — — — —
20 2024 54–17 76.1% #3 2,119 1 9 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0
21 2025 43–16 72.9% #3 2,100 2 11 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0
22 2026 43–13 76.8% #4 2,159 2 12 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Gauff Qiang Wang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2019 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2020 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2021 15 10 25 60.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2022 23 16 39 59.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2023 40 9 49 81.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2024 35 10 45 77.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2025 25 11 36 69.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2026 28 7 35 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 182 73 255 71.4% 77 26 103 74.8% 26 14 40 65.0% — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/399 of Coco Gauff's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Gauff Qiang Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2019 16/16 2.8 4.8 65.0% 63.7% 42.2% 52.0% 54.1% 56.1% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2020 18/18 3.1 8.3 61.0% 69.1% 42.3% 46.5% 55.8% 58.6% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2021 49/51 5.1 5.3 60.9% 69.1% 47.5% 55.5% 44.3% 60.6% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2022 58/60 4.1 5.3 63.1% 67.1% 45.3% 57.8% 49.0% 59.2% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2023 66/67 3.9 3.3 60.1% 68.8% 48.2% 56.6% 51.7% 60.7% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2024 68/71 3.6 6.1 58.4% 73.6% 45.5% 56.7% 52.8% 62.1% 49.7% 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9%
21 2025 54/60 2.7 6.9 62.4% 67.8% 45.3% 49.7% 57.7% 59.4% 49.6% 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6%
22 2026 51/56 3.1 4.9 63.3% 68.3% 44.1% 49.5% 48.2% 59.5% 48.1% 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5%
Career — 380/399 3.7 5.4 61.4% 69.0% 45.7% 54.1% 51.2% 60.1% 46.8% — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Gauff Qiang Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2019 1694 127.4 -0.40 -1.45 0.957 49.2% -25 — +15 57.1% -0.11 5–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 110.5 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2020 1782 144.9 +0.78 +0.22 1.007 50.4% -13 -207 — 57.8% +0.27 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2021 1898 145.4 +3.52 +2.26 1.130 52.5% -104 +9 -86 60.2% +0.65 13–6 (68%) 10–7 (59%) 108.1 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2022 1927 158.3 +2.88 +2.90 1.106 52.0% -48 +73 -46 62.5% +0.84 6–4 (60%) 10–6 (63%) 103.4 -1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2023 2107 166.1 +4.50 +4.45 1.173 53.4% +40 -131 -245 70.9% +1.39 11–5 (69%) 8–1 (89%) 106.9 -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2024 2120 167.7 +4.83 +6.58 1.311 55.6% +53 -73 -151 70.9% +1.78 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 99.0 +0.77 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34
21 2025 2101 167.3 +2.64 +6.44 1.221 54.4% +20 +119 — 66.9% +1.29 12–3 (80%) 10–6 (63%) 106.5 +0.39 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12
22 2026 2159 167.0 +3.18 +5.97 1.186 53.6% +51 +13 -195 68.6% +1.34 17–10 (63%) 8–4 (67%) 105.5 -0.08 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38
Career — 2176 166.5 +3.36 +4.35 1.171 53.3% +7 +2 -129 66.2% +1.15 79–42 (65%) 61–33 (65%) 113.8 -0.55 — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.