Cristina Bucsa
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 19, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Feb 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Yuliia Starodubtseva | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Jasmine Paolini | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 1, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Cristina Bucsa vs Alison Van Uytvanck H2H: 0-1
Alison Van Uytvanck holds a 1–0 lead over Cristina Bucsa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alison Van Uytvanck leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Van Uytvanck won the 2022 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Van Uytvanck | 6-3 6-4 | Cristina Bucsa | Match data | Jan 19, 2022* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristina Bucsa | #40 | #30 | 1,446 | 1,816 | 57 | 91 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Alison Van Uytvanck | #229 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,772 | 123 | 149 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristina Bucsa | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #199 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #106 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #44 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #121 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #161 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2022 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2023 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #61 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2024 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #103 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,674 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,772 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #40 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #72 | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #344 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,609 | 0 | 5 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Cristina Bucsa | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2018 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 25 | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2019 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2024 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2020 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2021 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 2026 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 41 | 56 | 97 | 42.3% | 11 | 26 | 37 | 29.7% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | — | 85 | 90 | 175 | 48.6% | 22 | 34 | 56 | 39.3% | 16 | 25 | 41 | 39.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/149 of Cristina Bucsa's and 250/272 of Alison Van Uytvanck's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Cristina Bucsa | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3/3 | 4.0 | 5.3 | 61.8% | 66.5% | 34.7% | 49.3% | 52.4% | 54.4% | 42.3% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3/3 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 59.4% | 63.4% | 49.6% | 61.1% | 31.4% | 57.9% | 37.7% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4/4 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 60.5% | 56.2% | 32.9% | 46.0% | 48.3% | 50.4% | 41.2% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 27/27 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 60.8% | 63.0% | 51.0% | 51.3% | 46.0% | 58.1% | 40.9% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 23/37 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 58.9% | 64.4% | 48.6% | 53.1% | 49.1% | 57.9% | 36.7% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17/17 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 56.8% | 67.4% | 44.6% | 54.9% | 47.7% | 57.8% | 38.5% |
| 23 | 2021 | 7/7 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 73.1% | 50.9% | 35.2% | 46.8% | 44.5% | 46.9% | 43.6% | 2017 | 14/17 | 4.9 | 2.8 | 55.4% | 69.1% | 53.4% | 64.4% | 41.5% | 62.4% | 41.1% |
| 24 | 2022 | 13/13 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 68.7% | 56.2% | 41.6% | 57.8% | 45.5% | 51.5% | 41.7% | 2018 | 39/41 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 62.4% | 65.5% | 48.1% | 61.6% | 44.8% | 59.2% | 42.5% |
| 25 | 2023 | 29/29 | 1.1 | 3.5 | 63.8% | 55.8% | 40.3% | 45.3% | 44.7% | 50.2% | 41.7% | 2019 | 42/42 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 64.8% | 63.0% | 47.3% | 55.8% | 46.2% | 57.4% | 44.5% |
| 26 | 2024 | 34/37 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 66.1% | 59.9% | 44.3% | 52.5% | 48.5% | 54.6% | 43.4% | 2020 | 18/18 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 62.3% | 66.6% | 46.1% | 47.0% | 40.8% | 58.7% | 41.1% |
| 27 | 2025 | 20/35 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 64.3% | 68.2% | 44.2% | 68.7% | 36.7% | 59.7% | 43.9% | 2021 | 27/30 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 60.0% | 63.1% | 45.0% | 54.3% | 52.1% | 56.0% | 44.7% |
| 28 | 2026 | 25/28 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 63.9% | 59.0% | 43.2% | 44.9% | 44.8% | 52.9% | 41.9% | 2022 | 22/22 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 58.2% | 64.6% | 48.0% | 60.7% | 42.8% | 57.8% | 43.0% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7/7 | 4.9 | 2.1 | 60.8% | 65.7% | 40.3% | 59.0% | 60.3% | 55.8% | 40.6% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 61.9% | 50.4% | 34.4% | 43.3% | 51.0% | 44.3% | 40.5% |
| Career | — | 128/149 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 65.5% | 59.2% | 42.4% | 52.1% | 44.6% | 53.3% | 42.6% | — | 250/272 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 60.8% | 64.4% | 47.1% | 55.7% | 46.4% | 57.7% | 41.8% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Cristina Bucsa | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1511 | 108.0 | -2.51 | -2.37 | 0.928 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -0.43 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.15 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1555 | 103.7 | +2.11 | -1.71 | 0.894 | 47.9% | — | +51 | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.05 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1524 | 90.5 | -1.68 | -1.92 | 0.831 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.13 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.29 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1526 | 113.6 | +1.00 | -2.70 | 0.975 | 49.4% | -8 | +12 | +42 | 43.3% | -0.03 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–6 (14%) | 92.5 | +0.20 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1487 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1647 | 123.7 | +0.26 | -3.01 | 0.870 | 47.5% | -6 | -88 | -87 | 50.6% | -0.10 | 7–4 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 106.0 | +0.57 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1499 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1517 | 106.5 | +0.03 | -3.82 | 0.912 | 48.2% | +32 | — | -45 | 36.6% | -0.90 | 0–7 (0%) | 3–3 (50%) | 92.1 | +0.27 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1547 | 120.8 | -3.76 | -1.11 | 0.820 | 45.3% | — | +21 | — | 26.7% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.27 | 2017 | 1634 | 121.0 | +2.65 | -1.27 | 1.095 | 51.6% | +11 | -34 | — | 55.3% | +0.42 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.5 | +0.26 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1686 | 118.4 | -2.96 | +0.15 | 0.858 | 46.9% | -9 | -59 | — | 33.3% | -1.23 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.37 | 2018 | 1661 | 129.7 | +1.86 | -0.17 | 1.042 | 50.6% | -23 | -93 | -60 | 46.9% | +0.15 | 8–8 (50%) | 4–10 (29%) | 97.5 | -1.03 |
| 25 | 2023 | 1712 | 126.2 | -3.79 | -0.06 | 0.837 | 46.0% | +17 | -88 | -66 | 34.8% | -1.20 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 105.8 | -1.29 | 2019 | 1736 | 130.4 | +0.69 | +0.82 | 1.044 | 50.9% | -1 | -93 | -105 | 55.9% | +0.33 | 9–4 (69%) | 4–1 (80%) | 107.5 | +0.05 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1679 | 130.3 | -1.56 | +0.24 | 0.955 | 49.0% | -2 | -29 | -36 | 42.4% | -0.46 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | +0.76 | 2020 | 1674 | 126.9 | +0.77 | -1.27 | 0.995 | 49.6% | +24 | -57 | — | 46.3% | -0.07 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–4 (33%) | 96.2 | +0.13 |
| 27 | 2025 | 1759 | 134.5 | +2.00 | +1.14 | 1.090 | 51.5% | +14 | -203 | -63 | 46.8% | -0.05 | 4–7 (36%) | 1–6 (14%) | 94.9 | -0.19 | 2021 | 1772 | 134.7 | -0.09 | +1.01 | 1.015 | 50.6% | +34 | -271 | -124 | 51.5% | +0.36 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -0.37 |
| 28 | 2026 | 1739 | 136.2 | -3.17 | -0.52 | 0.890 | 47.2% | +44 | -246 | — | 43.9% | -0.45 | 5–5 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | 98.8 | +1.04 | 2022 | 1685 | 128.7 | +0.29 | +0.04 | 1.018 | 50.4% | -5 | — | +57 | 50.0% | +0.19 | 0–8 (0%) | 2–6 (25%) | 86.9 | +0.23 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1687 | 120.1 | -1.26 | +0.60 | 0.919 | 48.7% | -9 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.39 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.6 | -0.67 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1609 | 96.6 | -3.25 | -1.92 | 0.727 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 11.1% | -2.89 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.23 |
| Career | — | 1816 | 133.0 | -2.09 | +0.08 | 0.913 | 47.9% | +16 | -83 | -58 | 40.7% | -0.62 | 24–26 (48%) | 14–19 (42%) | 97.6 | -0.22 | — | 1772 | 129.8 | +0.64 | -0.86 | 0.987 | 49.7% | +4 | -70 | -50 | 48.1% | -0.02 | 39–53 (42%) | 28–44 (39%) | 92.0 | +0.02 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Alison Van Uytvanck
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jan 10, 2019 | H2H |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 29, 2021 | H2H |
| Polona Hercog | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 25, 2020 | H2H |
| Kirsten Flipkens | 3 | 2 | 5 | Sep 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 2, 2021 | H2H |