Daria Saville
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 7 | 9 | Apr 4, 2024 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jan 13, 2024 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 8, 2018 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 26, 2022 | H2H |
| Samantha Stosur | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 5, 2018 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Daria Saville and Shelby Rogers are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daria Saville won the 2017 Hong Kong Open second round 6-1 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Saville | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Shelby Rogers | Match data | Oct 13, 2017* | R16 | Hong Kong Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Shelby Rogers | 7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(5) | Daria Saville | Match data | Aug 31, 2017* | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,858 | 159 | 156 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Shelby Rogers | #437 | #30 | 1,698 | 1,855 | 126 | 140 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Saville | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #25 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #151 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #59 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #35 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #242 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #630 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #47 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #149 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #341 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Daria Saville | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 13 | 17 | 30 | 43.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2014 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2015 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2017 | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2016 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2018 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2017 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2019 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 27 | 2021 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2021 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 29 | 2023 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2022 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 30 | 2024 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2023 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 31 | 2025 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 105 | 101 | 206 | 51.0% | 39 | 34 | 73 | 53.4% | 15 | 21 | 36 | 41.7% | — | 77 | 82 | 159 | 48.4% | 38 | 40 | 78 | 48.7% | 11 | 18 | 29 | 37.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 287/316 of Daria Saville's and 252/266 of Shelby Rogers's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Daria Saville | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2010 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 46.6% | 59.3% | 38.7% | 44.4% | 33.3% | 48.3% | 32.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 49.2% | 68.9% | 41.3% | 60.0% | 60.0% | 54.8% | 35.5% |
| 18 | 2012 | 2/2 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 63.0% | 65.8% | 46.5% | 33.3% | 60.0% | 58.2% | 55.1% | 2011 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 51.7% | 54.8% | 51.7% | 37.5% | 22.2% | 53.3% | 36.7% |
| 19 | 2013 | 8/8 | 2.9 | 6.5 | 55.6% | 56.5% | 36.1% | 47.6% | 53.1% | 47.6% | 40.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 61.7% | 57.5% | 39.0% | 39.8% | 50.0% | 50.3% | 47.0% | 2013 | 3/5 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 62.8% | 67.6% | 53.3% | 59.4% | 27.8% | 62.3% | 34.2% |
| 21 | 2015 | 31/41 | 2.5 | 4.6 | 66.2% | 62.3% | 49.2% | 54.6% | 52.2% | 57.6% | 41.8% | 2014 | 20/21 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 59.4% | 66.1% | 43.5% | 47.9% | 39.3% | 57.1% | 42.8% |
| 22 | 2016 | 37/47 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 63.1% | 62.0% | 47.1% | 52.1% | 44.7% | 56.5% | 44.0% | 2015 | 13/18 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 61.1% | 58.1% | 48.5% | 48.5% | 41.6% | 54.1% | 35.9% |
| 23 | 2017 | 54/55 | 2.7 | 4.8 | 62.9% | 64.0% | 45.6% | 46.7% | 50.8% | 57.1% | 45.6% | 2016 | 25/28 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 59.2% | 65.0% | 50.8% | 53.1% | 54.6% | 59.3% | 43.0% |
| 24 | 2018 | 48/51 | 1.8 | 7.7 | 65.7% | 62.8% | 37.3% | 53.1% | 51.4% | 54.1% | 45.5% | 2017 | 40/42 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 61.9% | 65.3% | 49.1% | 54.4% | 51.6% | 59.1% | 41.4% |
| 25 | 2019 | 21/22 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 66.4% | 56.8% | 43.9% | 45.7% | 46.5% | 52.4% | 41.3% | 2018 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 57.9% | 60.1% | 48.5% | 36.8% | 57.7% | 55.1% | 40.1% |
| 26 | 2020 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 59.8% | 62.1% | 52.1% | 75.0% | 73.2% | 58.6% | 43.5% | 2019 | 12/12 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 58.6% | 62.2% | 47.5% | 50.8% | 52.1% | 56.2% | 43.6% |
| 27 | 2021 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 57.5% | 66.2% | 46.6% | 52.5% | 44.5% | 57.9% | 47.1% | 2020 | 14/14 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 60.1% | 67.3% | 48.7% | 55.8% | 53.6% | 59.4% | 39.3% |
| 28 | 2022 | 33/34 | 2.2 | 5.0 | 64.1% | 64.5% | 44.3% | 58.4% | 45.6% | 57.5% | 44.2% | 2021 | 49/49 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 62.3% | 67.1% | 50.2% | 54.5% | 49.2% | 60.6% | 43.8% |
| 29 | 2023 | 14/14 | 1.3 | 4.8 | 63.7% | 61.1% | 38.3% | 45.4% | 53.3% | 53.3% | 45.8% | 2022 | 38/39 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 60.1% | 67.1% | 49.9% | 58.3% | 49.5% | 60.2% | 40.2% |
| 30 | 2024 | 25/25 | 2.1 | 6.2 | 67.4% | 57.8% | 41.9% | 59.3% | 57.6% | 52.5% | 45.9% | 2023 | 22/22 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 60.1% | 68.2% | 45.8% | 55.2% | 50.0% | 59.0% | 39.0% |
| 31 | 2025 | 5/8 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 69.5% | 56.9% | 39.9% | 48.9% | 60.2% | 51.1% | 40.2% | 2024 | 12/12 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 58.0% | 64.8% | 47.7% | 51.0% | 41.6% | 57.3% | 40.4% |
| Career | — | 287/316 | 2.1 | 5.3 | 64.3% | 61.8% | 43.5% | 51.8% | 50.3% | 55.3% | 44.3% | — | 252/266 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 60.5% | 65.7% | 48.7% | 53.7% | 48.8% | 58.9% | 41.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Daria Saville | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2010 | 1494 | 101.6 | +1.65 | -1.80 | 0.633 | 40.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1494 | 105.0 | +0.17 | +0.58 | 0.785 | 45.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 18 | 2012 | 1508 | 107.7 | +0.29 | +3.39 | 1.317 | 57.0% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.06 | 2011 | 1479 | 95.8 | -4.03 | -4.58 | 0.787 | 43.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.08 |
| 19 | 2013 | 1462 | 101.0 | -2.47 | -1.24 | 0.771 | 44.0% | +3 | — | — | 26.3% | -1.63 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | +1.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 1483 | 109.1 | +0.25 | +0.24 | 0.946 | 48.8% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.01 | 2013 | 1478 | 105.2 | +0.56 | -2.93 | 0.907 | 49.1% | — | +62 | — | 50.0% | +0.17 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.53 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1675 | 139.1 | +0.59 | +1.21 | 0.985 | 50.0% | -73 | -34 | -29 | 50.0% | -0.05 | 8–8 (50%) | 10–6 (63%) | 106.8 | -1.55 | 2014 | 1631 | 132.2 | +1.08 | -0.03 | 0.997 | 49.8% | -30 | -7 | — | 53.2% | +0.15 | 4–1 (80%) | 4–3 (57%) | 105.7 | -0.57 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1837 | 143.7 | +0.70 | +1.71 | 1.011 | 50.3% | -38 | -114 | -194 | 54.4% | +0.28 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–2 (60%) | 104.2 | -1.91 | 2015 | 1528 | 107.8 | -2.17 | -3.76 | 0.783 | 44.7% | +11 | +55 | — | 28.2% | -1.67 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–3 (0%) | 92.8 | -0.14 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1795 | 139.8 | +0.45 | +2.93 | 1.061 | 51.3% | +20 | -6 | -173 | 57.7% | +0.43 | 14–13 (52%) | 7–12 (37%) | 96.3 | +1.08 | 2016 | 1585 | 127.2 | +2.25 | +0.12 | 1.057 | 51.1% | -39 | +110 | — | 49.3% | +0.09 | 5–8 (38%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.4 | +0.44 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1781 | 141.0 | -2.19 | +2.60 | 0.991 | 49.8% | +14 | 0 | -108 | 52.2% | -0.08 | 11–8 (58%) | 13–1 (93%) | 108.4 | -0.58 | 2017 | 1689 | 133.0 | +2.26 | -1.35 | 1.011 | 50.1% | -50 | +54 | -96 | 52.0% | +0.14 | 10–8 (56%) | 10–4 (71%) | 108.3 | -1.20 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1604 | 107.6 | -2.88 | -1.35 | 0.868 | 46.7% | +84 | +22 | +39 | 27.7% | -1.28 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–4 (20%) | 99.5 | -0.63 | 2018 | 1650 | 103.6 | -2.39 | -1.26 | 0.893 | 47.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.21 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1617 | 108.7 | +0.59 | +1.52 | 1.052 | 51.9% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.40 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.14 | 2019 | 1574 | 111.3 | -0.80 | -0.46 | 0.996 | 50.1% | — | +121 | +52 | 44.8% | -0.31 | 0–7 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.20 |
| 27 | 2021 | 1646 | 128.1 | +1.67 | +2.64 | 1.117 | 52.5% | +67 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.38 | 2020 | 1680 | 132.2 | +1.94 | -0.55 | 0.967 | 49.3% | +16 | — | — | 51.5% | -0.12 | 4–1 (80%) | 3–2 (60%) | 106.2 | +0.47 |
| 28 | 2022 | 1738 | 136.6 | +0.54 | +0.98 | 1.039 | 50.8% | +82 | -119 | -95 | 53.7% | +0.39 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–5 (17%) | 97.2 | +0.65 | 2021 | 1805 | 147.1 | +3.43 | +1.34 | 1.111 | 52.0% | +24 | -149 | -144 | 57.1% | +0.48 | 6–10 (38%) | 8–6 (57%) | 96.6 | -0.42 |
| 29 | 2023 | 1687 | 124.8 | -0.97 | +1.63 | 0.980 | 49.5% | +59 | +5 | — | 45.2% | +0.03 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.6 | -0.28 | 2022 | 1804 | 144.1 | +2.94 | -1.21 | 1.009 | 50.3% | +44 | -170 | -145 | 52.2% | -0.08 | 6–10 (38%) | 7–2 (78%) | 99.2 | -1.95 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1668 | 125.0 | -3.56 | +1.68 | 0.966 | 49.2% | +38 | -36 | +6 | 45.9% | -0.21 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.3 | -0.44 | 2023 | 1773 | 137.9 | +1.67 | -1.25 | 0.951 | 49.1% | +77 | -140 | — | 42.6% | -0.41 | 5–7 (42%) | 0–6 (0%) | 92.1 | -1.29 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1662 | 123.9 | -0.99 | -0.65 | 0.821 | 45.9% | +19 | — | — | 35.3% | -1.06 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.37 | 2024 | 1676 | 122.2 | -0.04 | -0.79 | 0.948 | 48.6% | +36 | -21 | — | 32.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.39 |
| Career | — | 1859 | 140.0 | -0.68 | +1.60 | 0.990 | 49.8% | +11 | -29 | -92 | 49.6% | -0.03 | 59–51 (54%) | 42–41 (51%) | 102.9 | -1.15 | — | 1856 | 140.0 | +1.85 | -0.58 | 1.004 | 50.0% | +8 | -8 | -100 | 48.9% | -0.10 | 41–61 (40%) | 39–36 (52%) | 94.4 | -1.71 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 7 | 9 | Apr 4, 2024 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jan 13, 2024 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 8, 2018 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 26, 2022 | H2H |
| Samantha Stosur | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 5, 2018 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Rybakina | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 5, 2023 | H2H |
| Ashleigh Barty | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 4, 2021 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 8, 2024 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 25, 2022 | H2H |
| Veronika Kudermetova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 4, 2024 | H2H |