H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Lin Zhu H2H: 1-1
Ekaterina Alexandrova and Lin Zhu are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2025 Montreal second round 1-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2025 | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Match data |
| Aug 25, 2023* | Cleveland | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Ekaterina Alexandrova | 7-5 6-2 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | #19 | #10 | 3,375 | 1,985 | 248 | 189 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | Lin Zhu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #34 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,905 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #28 | 1,780 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 6 | 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #19 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |