H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Elena Rybakina vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich H2H: 3-0
Elena Rybakina holds a 3–0 lead over Aliaksandra Sasnovich in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elena Rybakina leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Rybakina won the 2022 Ostrava fourth round 6-7(5) 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 27
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2022* | Ostrava | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Elena Rybakina | 6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2021* | Chicago 2 | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Elena Rybakina | 6-4 6-4 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Elena Rybakina | 6-2 6-3 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Rybakina | #2 | #2 | 8,705 | 2,247 | 296 | 125 | 70.3% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Rybakina | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #435 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #37 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #14 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #21 | 1,906 | 1 | 3 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #4 | 2,017 | 1 | 5 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,031 | 1 | 8 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #5 | 2,168 | 1 | 11 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 34–11 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,104 | 2 | 13 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |