H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Elena Rybakina vs Fiona Ferro H2H: 1-2
Fiona Ferro holds a 2–1 lead over Elena Rybakina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Fiona Ferro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fiona Ferro won the 2021 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 27
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Fiona Ferro | 6-4 6-4 | Elena Rybakina | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Fiona Ferro | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Elena Rybakina | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2020* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Elena Rybakina | 6-3 6-4 | Fiona Ferro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Rybakina | #2 | #2 | 8,705 | 2,247 | 296 | 125 | 70.3% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Fiona Ferro | #189 | #39 | 1,649 | 1,799 | 55 | 72 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Rybakina | Fiona Ferro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #345 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #435 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #37 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #102 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #14 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #21 | 1,906 | 1 | 3 | 2020 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #42 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2023 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #4 | 2,017 | 1 | 5 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #103 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2024 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,031 | 1 | 8 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #411 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2025 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #5 | 2,168 | 1 | 11 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2026 | 34–11 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,104 | 2 | 13 | 2024 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #366 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 |