H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 2-0
Elise Mertens holds a 2–0 lead over Andrea Petkovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elise Mertens leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2019 US Open third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-3 6-3 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
| Jun 20, 2019* | Mallorca | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Elise Mertens | 6-2 6-2 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Andrea Petkovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |