H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Julia Goerges H2H: 0-1
Julia Goerges holds a 1–0 lead over Elise Mertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2018 Zhuhai fourth round 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2018* | Zhuhai | WTA Finals | R16 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 7-6(5) | Elise Mertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elise Mertens | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |