Elise Mertens
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 2 | 11 | 13 | Jul 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 4 | 7 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jul 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jul 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 10, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Julia Goerges holds a 1–0 lead over Elise Mertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2018 Zhuhai first round 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | 6-2 7-6(5) | Elise Mertens | Match data | Nov 2, 2018* | R16 | Zhuhai | WTA Finals | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #20 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,000 | 320 | 205 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,945 | 311 | 251 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #35 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #18 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,845 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,789 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,818 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,892 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,871 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2026 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #20 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,802 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 24 | 15 | 39 | 61.5% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 2020 | 23 | 9 | 32 | 71.9% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 30.4% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 35 | 13 | 48 | 72.9% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 28 | 14 | 42 | 66.7% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 206 | 128 | 334 | 61.7% | 74 | 44 | 118 | 62.7% | 40 | 33 | 73 | 54.8% | — | — | — | — | — | 197 | 156 | 353 | 55.8% | 86 | 73 | 159 | 54.1% | 26 | 20 | 46 | 56.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 495/526 of Elise Mertens's and 524/562 of Julia Goerges's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6/9 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 54.7% | 64.8% | 42.0% | 59.6% | 55.1% | 54.0% | 40.7% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11/13 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 59.1% | 67.7% | 46.8% | 52.0% | 47.2% | 59.3% | 39.2% |
| 20 | 2016 | 6/6 | 2.8 | 4.7 | 55.3% | 61.0% | 47.1% | 44.4% | 67.4% | 54.9% | 48.4% | 2009 | 19/20 | 5.2 | 2.4 | 60.4% | 68.6% | 50.1% | 58.4% | 43.6% | 61.4% | 40.4% |
| 21 | 2017 | 49/51 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 61.8% | 62.7% | 44.6% | 52.5% | 52.3% | 55.8% | 46.7% | 2010 | 49/51 | 4.2 | 3.5 | 61.2% | 66.7% | 45.8% | 58.1% | 48.1% | 58.5% | 43.3% |
| 22 | 2018 | 60/64 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 61.0% | 66.0% | 46.8% | 53.5% | 47.2% | 58.6% | 47.0% | 2011 | 59/60 | 4.1 | 2.7 | 58.4% | 70.4% | 49.1% | 52.6% | 48.8% | 61.3% | 43.2% |
| 23 | 2019 | 57/60 | 2.8 | 4.3 | 61.2% | 67.3% | 48.5% | 56.8% | 46.6% | 59.8% | 46.2% | 2012 | 56/62 | 3.9 | 2.9 | 57.7% | 67.0% | 48.1% | 54.3% | 47.8% | 59.1% | 43.6% |
| 24 | 2020 | 45/45 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 61.0% | 70.2% | 48.1% | 62.3% | 52.8% | 61.5% | 47.3% | 2013 | 40/41 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 55.6% | 66.4% | 44.5% | 53.8% | 46.9% | 56.5% | 40.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 50/52 | 3.8 | 5.9 | 58.5% | 68.3% | 43.7% | 49.4% | 51.2% | 57.9% | 46.8% | 2014 | 31/33 | 6.1 | 4.1 | 59.2% | 68.5% | 48.8% | 54.2% | 44.2% | 60.3% | 42.5% |
| 26 | 2022 | 47/49 | 3.3 | 5.7 | 57.9% | 69.3% | 44.9% | 46.9% | 52.3% | 58.8% | 46.7% | 2015 | 30/37 | 4.7 | 2.5 | 60.0% | 67.8% | 47.7% | 49.3% | 50.2% | 59.9% | 40.7% |
| 27 | 2023 | 47/47 | 3.8 | 6.6 | 54.0% | 68.2% | 43.7% | 49.7% | 48.3% | 57.0% | 46.4% | 2016 | 36/42 | 5.0 | 3.4 | 56.9% | 71.9% | 49.2% | 58.3% | 41.9% | 61.9% | 40.6% |
| 28 | 2024 | 52/52 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 54.9% | 67.7% | 47.2% | 49.2% | 43.5% | 58.6% | 43.5% | 2017 | 64/68 | 5.8 | 3.4 | 57.0% | 72.1% | 49.1% | 56.1% | 50.6% | 62.3% | 42.7% |
| 29 | 2025 | 42/57 | 4.7 | 4.2 | 55.7% | 70.9% | 46.7% | 61.7% | 45.9% | 60.1% | 44.3% | 2018 | 65/68 | 7.4 | 3.7 | 57.7% | 74.7% | 49.3% | 59.1% | 42.7% | 63.9% | 39.5% |
| 30 | 2026 | 40/43 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 59.7% | 71.5% | 43.3% | 59.2% | 45.6% | 60.2% | 44.6% | 2019 | 46/46 | 6.7 | 4.1 | 55.4% | 73.0% | 48.9% | 58.3% | 42.8% | 62.1% | 40.8% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 12/12 | 6.6 | 3.5 | 56.8% | 70.9% | 47.8% | 60.1% | 48.8% | 61.0% | 40.5% |
| Career | — | 495/526 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 58.6% | 67.9% | 45.9% | 53.8% | 48.7% | 58.8% | 46.0% | — | 524/562 | 5.3 | 3.4 | 57.9% | 70.0% | 48.1% | 55.9% | 46.6% | 60.7% | 41.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1544 | 122.1 | +0.76 | +0.36 | 0.884 | 47.2% | +9 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.95 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.18 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1558 | 111.9 | +1.60 | -1.77 | 0.961 | 49.2% | +4 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.13 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.9 | +0.66 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1546 | 114.6 | +0.31 | +2.24 | 1.071 | 51.6% | — | — | +187 | 53.3% | +0.73 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.48 | 2009 | 1590 | 119.7 | +2.92 | -2.21 | 1.046 | 50.8% | -1 | -63 | +41 | 50.0% | +0.09 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.5 | -0.08 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1734 | 133.6 | +0.24 | +2.71 | 1.057 | 51.3% | -42 | -32 | -72 | 54.4% | +0.38 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–8 (43%) | 104.5 | -1.32 | 2010 | 1761 | 134.3 | +2.06 | +0.13 | 1.043 | 51.0% | -59 | -53 | — | 54.7% | +0.42 | 9–6 (60%) | 3–6 (33%) | 104.4 | -1.65 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1820 | 149.2 | +2.19 | +3.65 | 1.136 | 52.8% | -27 | +78 | -134 | 64.7% | +1.14 | 11–6 (65%) | 10–9 (53%) | 102.7 | +1.85 | 2011 | 1774 | 141.6 | +5.63 | -0.14 | 1.115 | 52.1% | -57 | +89 | -162 | 55.6% | +0.56 | 11–8 (58%) | 4–11 (27%) | 98.6 | -1.13 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1841 | 151.4 | +3.21 | +3.08 | 1.150 | 52.7% | +18 | -36 | -88 | 58.2% | +0.82 | 9–12 (43%) | 6–9 (40%) | 95.6 | -0.24 | 2012 | 1761 | 139.8 | +2.73 | +0.03 | 1.067 | 51.4% | +21 | +17 | -68 | 55.1% | +0.34 | 11–7 (61%) | 9–12 (43%) | 100.1 | -0.26 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1934 | 157.8 | +3.90 | +3.73 | 1.228 | 54.2% | +19 | -60 | — | 67.6% | +1.38 | 7–5 (58%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.9 | -0.09 | 2013 | 1544 | 119.3 | +0.51 | -3.35 | 0.920 | 48.5% | +41 | +130 | — | 40.4% | -0.70 | 5–10 (33%) | 2–7 (22%) | 89.5 | +1.42 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1845 | 151.6 | +1.62 | +4.16 | 1.112 | 52.2% | +60 | +64 | -104 | 60.3% | +0.89 | 10–6 (63%) | 8–6 (57%) | 101.2 | -0.07 | 2014 | 1588 | 128.4 | +3.16 | -0.41 | 1.070 | 51.1% | +14 | +50 | — | 51.2% | +0.09 | 4–14 (22%) | 3–5 (38%) | 89.3 | -1.01 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1789 | 144.1 | +1.46 | +3.03 | 1.134 | 52.5% | +31 | +82 | -28 | 55.7% | +0.70 | 7–9 (44%) | 4–5 (44%) | 94.2 | +1.98 | 2015 | 1610 | 130.1 | +1.79 | -0.65 | 1.013 | 50.5% | -4 | +23 | — | 47.6% | +0.12 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.9 | -0.01 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1819 | 147.2 | +0.37 | +2.82 | 1.081 | 51.6% | +29 | +20 | -94 | 56.6% | +0.57 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–3 (70%) | 100.3 | -0.17 | 2016 | 1668 | 133.2 | +4.47 | -2.01 | 1.064 | 51.3% | 0 | +4 | — | 52.2% | +0.42 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | 99.7 | -0.80 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1789 | 149.2 | +1.83 | +1.03 | 1.051 | 50.7% | +1 | +82 | -81 | 54.0% | +0.28 | 8–9 (47%) | 1–5 (17%) | 96.0 | -1.04 | 2017 | 1893 | 143.8 | +5.08 | -0.79 | 1.134 | 52.4% | +26 | -228 | -276 | 66.4% | +0.92 | 12–7 (63%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | -0.01 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1867 | 155.7 | +3.19 | +1.74 | 1.111 | 52.0% | -32 | +16 | +59 | 63.3% | +0.97 | 7–10 (41%) | 10–7 (59%) | 98.4 | -1.11 | 2018 | 1872 | 146.7 | +6.30 | -1.90 | 1.092 | 51.6% | +1 | -125 | -90 | 62.3% | +0.73 | 16–8 (67%) | 14–7 (67%) | 107.5 | -0.46 |
| 30 | 2026 | 1899 | 147.2 | +2.55 | +2.23 | 1.122 | 52.2% | -42 | -27 | +78 | 59.2% | +0.78 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.1 | +1.70 | 2019 | 1802 | 139.1 | +4.10 | -1.39 | 1.079 | 51.4% | +14 | -176 | +70 | 56.9% | +0.57 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–8 (43%) | 95.7 | +0.72 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1764 | 128.3 | +1.47 | -1.09 | 1.038 | 50.8% | +27 | -153 | — | 50.0% | +0.29 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.9 | -0.07 |
| Career | — | 2000 | 153.9 | +2.02 | +2.84 | 1.116 | 52.2% | +3 | +18 | -22 | 59.4% | +0.80 | 82–79 (51%) | 58–57 (50%) | 98.9 | +0.19 | — | 1945 | 141.6 | +3.70 | -1.05 | 1.060 | 51.2% | +1 | -18 | -76 | 54.8% | +0.37 | 95–87 (52%) | 68–83 (45%) | 95.2 | -0.51 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 2 | 11 | 13 | Jul 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 4 | 7 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jul 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jul 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 10, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Wozniacki | 6 | 5 | 11 | Jan 11, 2020 | H2H |
| Barbora Strycova | 5 | 5 | 10 | Jul 8, 2018 | H2H |
| Anastasija Sevastova | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 10, 2018 | H2H |
| Polona Hercog | 5 | 2 | 7 | Sep 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 4 | 3 | 7 | Apr 25, 2019 | H2H |