H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Katerina Siniakova H2H: 4-0
Elise Mertens holds a 4–0 lead over Katerina Siniakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Elise Mertens leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2024 Rome second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2024* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Elise Mertens | 6-1 6-4 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2021* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Elise Mertens | 6-4 6-4 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2019* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-4 6-0 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2019* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-4 6-2 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Katerina Siniakova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 |