H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Mandy Minella H2H: 1-0
Elise Mertens holds a 1–0 lead over Mandy Minella in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elise Mertens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2018 Lugano third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2018* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Elise Mertens | 6-4 6-1 | Mandy Minella | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Mandy Minella | #787 | #66 | 955 | 1,644 | 58 | 102 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Mandy Minella | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #77 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #168 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #262 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |