Elise Mertens
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 2 | 11 | 13 | Jul 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 4 | 7 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jul 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jul 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 10, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Qinwen Zheng H2H: 0-2
Qinwen Zheng holds a 2–0 lead over Elise Mertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Qinwen Zheng leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qinwen Zheng won the 2026 China Open semifinal 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qinwen Zheng | 7-5 6-2 | Elise Mertens | Match data | Oct 10, 2026 | SF | China Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Qinwen Zheng | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Elise Mertens | Match data | Apr 3, 2025 | R16 | Charleston Open | WTA 500 | Clay |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #14 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,000 | 326 | 210 | 60.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Qinwen Zheng | #22 | #4 | 5,340 | 2,105 | 148 | 82 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #35 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #5 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 2,005 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #22 | 2,020 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,845 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,789 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,818 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,889 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 20 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2023 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2017 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2024 | 30 | 11 | 41 | 73.2% | 17 | 4 | 21 | 81.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 2018 | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2025 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 2019 | 24 | 15 | 39 | 61.5% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2026 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 2020 | 23 | 9 | 32 | 71.9% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 212 | 133 | 345 | 61.4% | 74 | 44 | 118 | 62.7% | 40 | 33 | 73 | 54.8% | — | 95 | 49 | 144 | 66.0% | 46 | 19 | 65 | 70.8% | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 505/537 of Elise Mertens's and 213/230 of Qinwen Zheng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 44.2% | 76.6% | 41.4% | 64.5% | 49.6% | 56.8% | 34.5% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 37/39 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 52.2% | 76.1% | 45.3% | 61.3% | 43.8% | 61.5% | 42.9% |
| 20 | 2016 | 6/6 | 2.8 | 4.7 | 55.3% | 61.0% | 47.1% | 44.4% | 67.4% | 54.9% | 48.4% | 2023 | 52/55 | 6.6 | 4.2 | 51.4% | 74.7% | 45.7% | 59.8% | 48.0% | 60.6% | 43.5% |
| 21 | 2017 | 49/51 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 61.8% | 62.7% | 44.6% | 52.5% | 52.3% | 55.8% | 46.7% | 2024 | 59/65 | 6.7 | 3.6 | 52.9% | 76.9% | 47.4% | 57.6% | 49.0% | 63.0% | 44.1% |
| 22 | 2018 | 60/64 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 61.0% | 66.0% | 46.8% | 53.5% | 47.2% | 58.6% | 47.0% | 2025 | 26/32 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 55.3% | 70.7% | 46.4% | 49.9% | 55.0% | 59.9% | 45.6% |
| 23 | 2019 | 57/60 | 2.8 | 4.3 | 61.2% | 67.3% | 48.5% | 56.8% | 46.6% | 59.8% | 46.2% | 2026 | 35/35 | 8.0 | 4.5 | 52.6% | 75.1% | 48.7% | 55.1% | 47.7% | 62.7% | 39.4% |
| 24 | 2020 | 45/45 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 61.0% | 70.2% | 48.1% | 62.3% | 52.8% | 61.5% | 47.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 50/52 | 3.8 | 5.9 | 58.5% | 68.3% | 43.7% | 49.4% | 51.2% | 57.9% | 46.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 47/49 | 3.3 | 5.7 | 57.9% | 69.3% | 44.9% | 46.9% | 52.3% | 58.8% | 46.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 47/47 | 3.8 | 6.6 | 54.0% | 68.2% | 43.7% | 49.7% | 48.3% | 57.0% | 46.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 52/52 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 54.9% | 67.7% | 47.2% | 49.2% | 43.5% | 58.6% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 42/57 | 4.7 | 4.2 | 55.7% | 70.9% | 46.7% | 61.7% | 45.9% | 60.1% | 44.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 50/54 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 59.9% | 71.2% | 43.7% | 56.7% | 45.3% | 60.3% | 44.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 505/537 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 58.7% | 68.0% | 45.8% | 53.6% | 48.6% | 58.8% | 45.9% | — | 213/230 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 52.5% | 75.2% | 46.6% | 57.6% | 48.4% | 61.6% | 43.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1493 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1560 | 120.6 | +0.23 | -1.61 | 0.799 | 46.5% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.25 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1830 | 148.1 | +4.12 | +1.19 | 1.114 | 52.1% | -26 | -68 | -222 | 52.9% | +0.10 | 9–8 (53%) | 9–5 (64%) | 108.5 | -0.97 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1546 | 116.3 | +0.31 | +2.24 | 1.071 | 51.6% | — | — | +188 | 53.3% | +0.73 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.48 | 2023 | 1965 | 158.6 | +3.42 | +1.11 | 1.104 | 51.9% | +22 | -50 | -426 | 59.4% | +0.73 | 16–6 (73%) | 7–4 (64%) | 110.5 | -0.43 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1734 | 133.9 | +0.24 | +2.71 | 1.057 | 51.3% | -42 | -32 | -72 | 54.4% | +0.38 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–8 (43%) | 104.5 | -1.31 | 2024 | 2090 | 165.0 | +5.64 | +2.11 | 1.193 | 53.3% | +1 | +11 | -537 | 66.0% | +1.35 | 19–5 (79%) | 7–7 (50%) | 108.7 | +0.04 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1820 | 149.2 | +2.19 | +3.65 | 1.136 | 52.8% | -27 | +79 | -133 | 64.7% | +1.14 | 11–6 (65%) | 10–9 (53%) | 102.7 | +1.85 | 2025 | 2006 | 153.9 | +2.79 | +2.67 | 1.138 | 52.7% | +23 | +110 | -445 | 63.8% | +0.88 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 98.3 | -0.13 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1841 | 151.4 | +3.21 | +3.08 | 1.150 | 52.7% | +18 | -35 | -88 | 58.2% | +0.82 | 9–12 (43%) | 6–9 (40%) | 95.6 | -0.26 | 2026 | 2021 | 150.9 | +4.77 | -1.43 | 1.054 | 50.7% | +89 | +28 | -463 | 55.2% | +0.28 | 13–6 (68%) | 7–2 (78%) | 107.9 | -1.26 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1934 | 157.8 | +3.90 | +3.73 | 1.228 | 54.2% | +18 | -60 | — | 67.6% | +1.38 | 7–5 (58%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.9 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 1845 | 151.6 | +1.62 | +4.16 | 1.112 | 52.2% | +60 | +64 | -104 | 60.3% | +0.89 | 10–6 (63%) | 8–6 (57%) | 101.2 | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 1790 | 144.2 | +1.46 | +3.03 | 1.134 | 52.5% | +30 | +81 | -29 | 55.7% | +0.70 | 7–9 (44%) | 4–5 (44%) | 94.2 | +1.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 1819 | 147.2 | +0.37 | +2.82 | 1.081 | 51.6% | +29 | +20 | -94 | 56.6% | +0.57 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–3 (70%) | 100.3 | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 1789 | 149.2 | +1.83 | +1.03 | 1.051 | 50.7% | +1 | +82 | -81 | 54.0% | +0.28 | 8–9 (47%) | 1–5 (17%) | 96.0 | -1.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 1868 | 154.5 | +3.20 | +1.74 | 1.111 | 52.0% | -33 | +15 | +56 | 63.0% | +0.89 | 7–10 (41%) | 10–7 (59%) | 98.4 | -1.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 1890 | 152.2 | +2.95 | +1.93 | 1.109 | 51.9% | -25 | -21 | +83 | 57.0% | +0.64 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.3 | +1.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2000 | 154.4 | +2.07 | +2.80 | 1.115 | 52.2% | +3 | +19 | -22 | 59.2% | +0.77 | 84–80 (51%) | 59–58 (50%) | 99.2 | +0.06 | — | 2106 | 160.6 | +4.24 | +1.12 | 1.119 | 52.1% | +18 | +11 | -407 | 59.5% | +0.72 | 60–29 (67%) | 34–23 (60%) | 115.5 | -1.24 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Qinwen Zheng
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 8 | 9 | Mar 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Liudmila Samsonova | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jun 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 29, 2026 | H2H |