H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Sofia Kenin H2H: 1-2
Sofia Kenin holds a 2–1 lead over Elise Mertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sofia Kenin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2020 US Open fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 27
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-3 6-3 | Sofia Kenin | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2019* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Sofia Kenin | 4-6 6-4 7-6(5) | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2019* | Mallorca | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Sofia Kenin | 1-6 6-1 6-3 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Sofia Kenin | #106 | #4 | 5,915 | 1,977 | 172 | 150 | 53.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Sofia Kenin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #52 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #14 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #4 | 1,953 | 1 | 5 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #12 | 1,836 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #228 | 1,666 | 1 | 5 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,791 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #81 | 1,735 | 1 | 5 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2025 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #28 | 1,788 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2026 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,665 | 1 | 5 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |