Elise Mertens
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 2 | 11 | 13 | Jul 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 4 | 7 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jul 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jul 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 10, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC
Elise Mertens and Yulia Putintseva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2021 San Jose quarterfinal 6-3 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 6-3 7-6(8) | Yulia Putintseva | Match data | Aug 7, 2021* | QF | San Jose | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Yulia Putintseva | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Elise Mertens | Match data | Feb 26, 2020* | R32 | Qatar Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #14 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,000 | 326 | 210 | 60.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Yulia Putintseva | #67 | #20 | 2,148 | 1,990 | 269 | 267 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Yulia Putintseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #35 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,820 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #44 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #21 | 1,845 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,789 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,818 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,889 | 0 | 10 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #67 | 1,811 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Yulia Putintseva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2015 | 3 | 12 | 15 | 20.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 2017 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2016 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2017 | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2019 | 24 | 15 | 39 | 61.5% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2018 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 2020 | 23 | 9 | 32 | 71.9% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16 | 17 | 33 | 48.5% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 25 | 2021 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2020 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2021 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2023 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2022 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 28 | 2024 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2023 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2025 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2024 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% |
| 30 | 2026 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2025 | 11 | 17 | 28 | 39.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 212 | 133 | 345 | 61.4% | 74 | 44 | 118 | 62.7% | 40 | 33 | 73 | 54.8% | — | 158 | 174 | 332 | 47.6% | 93 | 68 | 161 | 57.8% | 18 | 25 | 43 | 41.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 505/537 of Elise Mertens's and 498/538 of Yulia Putintseva's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Yulia Putintseva | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 54.5% | 50.0% | 35.0% | 37.5% | 50.0% | 43.2% | 37.3% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2/3 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 51.0% | 57.4% | 39.3% | 52.7% | 83.3% | 48.1% | 45.1% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 16/17 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 61.9% | 60.5% | 45.0% | 46.0% | 45.4% | 54.9% | 42.3% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11/11 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 63.0% | 58.1% | 44.3% | 36.2% | 51.4% | 52.4% | 43.5% |
| 20 | 2016 | 6/6 | 2.8 | 4.7 | 55.3% | 61.0% | 47.1% | 44.4% | 67.4% | 54.9% | 48.4% | 2015 | 23/27 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 63.3% | 58.5% | 53.3% | 52.7% | 39.7% | 56.4% | 40.3% |
| 21 | 2017 | 49/51 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 61.8% | 62.7% | 44.6% | 52.5% | 52.3% | 55.8% | 46.7% | 2016 | 43/51 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 71.0% | 58.8% | 49.6% | 55.4% | 51.1% | 56.2% | 46.9% |
| 22 | 2018 | 60/64 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 61.0% | 66.0% | 46.8% | 53.5% | 47.2% | 58.6% | 47.0% | 2017 | 46/48 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 65.9% | 59.4% | 44.5% | 47.4% | 48.4% | 54.4% | 44.5% |
| 23 | 2019 | 57/60 | 2.8 | 4.3 | 61.2% | 67.3% | 48.5% | 56.8% | 46.6% | 59.8% | 46.2% | 2018 | 36/40 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 69.3% | 59.0% | 46.2% | 41.7% | 48.5% | 54.8% | 44.7% |
| 24 | 2020 | 45/45 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 61.0% | 70.2% | 48.1% | 62.3% | 52.8% | 61.5% | 47.3% | 2019 | 49/52 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 66.5% | 61.6% | 47.9% | 49.5% | 51.6% | 56.8% | 44.4% |
| 25 | 2021 | 50/52 | 3.8 | 5.9 | 58.5% | 68.3% | 43.7% | 49.4% | 51.2% | 57.9% | 46.8% | 2020 | 25/25 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 69.0% | 61.0% | 43.7% | 52.0% | 49.1% | 55.7% | 44.9% |
| 26 | 2022 | 47/49 | 3.3 | 5.7 | 57.9% | 69.3% | 44.9% | 46.9% | 52.3% | 58.8% | 46.7% | 2021 | 52/53 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 68.5% | 61.7% | 49.4% | 54.0% | 50.9% | 57.9% | 46.2% |
| 27 | 2023 | 47/47 | 3.8 | 6.6 | 54.0% | 68.2% | 43.7% | 49.7% | 48.3% | 57.0% | 46.4% | 2022 | 38/38 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 69.5% | 61.9% | 45.2% | 51.2% | 46.6% | 56.7% | 44.5% |
| 28 | 2024 | 52/52 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 54.9% | 67.7% | 47.2% | 49.2% | 43.5% | 58.6% | 43.5% | 2023 | 42/45 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 73.4% | 61.8% | 44.0% | 60.0% | 48.6% | 57.0% | 44.3% |
| 29 | 2025 | 42/57 | 4.7 | 4.2 | 55.7% | 70.9% | 46.7% | 61.7% | 45.9% | 60.1% | 44.3% | 2024 | 51/51 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 70.0% | 62.4% | 50.3% | 57.0% | 55.0% | 58.9% | 46.4% |
| 30 | 2026 | 50/54 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 59.9% | 71.2% | 43.7% | 56.7% | 45.3% | 60.3% | 44.0% | 2025 | 28/41 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 71.0% | 59.9% | 43.6% | 49.3% | 51.1% | 55.4% | 39.7% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 35/35 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 70.6% | 58.4% | 45.9% | 53.3% | 45.0% | 54.8% | 44.1% |
| Career | — | 505/537 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 58.7% | 68.0% | 45.8% | 53.6% | 48.6% | 58.8% | 45.9% | — | 498/538 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 68.6% | 60.5% | 46.9% | 51.6% | 49.4% | 56.2% | 44.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Yulia Putintseva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1490 | 97.2 | +0.63 | -0.74 | 0.656 | 40.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.04 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1490 | 100.8 | -0.19 | -0.11 | 0.870 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1509 | 122.8 | -0.51 | -0.15 | 0.936 | 48.7% | +20 | +40 | +9 | 33.3% | -0.85 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–5 (17%) | 95.7 | -0.80 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1555 | 119.1 | -1.23 | -0.32 | 0.913 | 48.3% | -1 | +24 | — | 43.5% | -1.09 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–0 (100%) | 102.5 | -0.17 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1546 | 116.3 | +0.31 | +2.24 | 1.071 | 51.6% | — | — | +188 | 53.3% | +0.73 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.48 | 2015 | 1521 | 113.7 | -1.66 | -1.36 | 0.924 | 48.1% | -46 | +102 | — | 36.7% | -0.77 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.9 | +0.11 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1734 | 133.9 | +0.24 | +2.71 | 1.057 | 51.3% | -42 | -32 | -72 | 54.4% | +0.38 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–8 (43%) | 104.5 | -1.31 | 2016 | 1656 | 136.3 | +0.36 | +2.58 | 1.071 | 51.5% | -41 | +126 | -119 | 50.9% | +0.07 | 7–7 (50%) | 7–7 (50%) | 102.0 | +0.18 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1820 | 149.2 | +2.19 | +3.65 | 1.136 | 52.8% | -27 | +79 | -133 | 64.7% | +1.14 | 11–6 (65%) | 10–9 (53%) | 102.7 | +1.85 | 2017 | 1606 | 124.2 | -1.52 | +0.93 | 0.975 | 49.4% | +11 | +140 | -128 | 41.2% | -0.74 | 7–8 (47%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.3 | +0.67 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1841 | 151.4 | +3.21 | +3.08 | 1.150 | 52.7% | +18 | -35 | -88 | 58.2% | +0.82 | 9–12 (43%) | 6–9 (40%) | 95.6 | -0.26 | 2018 | 1656 | 123.1 | -1.00 | +0.88 | 0.990 | 49.7% | -27 | +80 | -146 | 49.5% | -0.07 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–6 (40%) | 97.9 | +0.84 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1934 | 157.8 | +3.90 | +3.73 | 1.228 | 54.2% | +18 | -60 | — | 67.6% | +1.38 | 7–5 (58%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.9 | -0.09 | 2019 | 1760 | 143.0 | +0.19 | +1.54 | 1.026 | 50.6% | -41 | +38 | -181 | 53.5% | +0.25 | 9–9 (50%) | 8–7 (53%) | 101.3 | -0.99 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1845 | 151.6 | +1.62 | +4.16 | 1.112 | 52.2% | +60 | +64 | -104 | 60.3% | +0.89 | 10–6 (63%) | 8–6 (57%) | 101.2 | -0.07 | 2020 | 1837 | 137.2 | -0.85 | +1.84 | 1.013 | 50.3% | -40 | -10 | — | 56.1% | +0.53 | 7–2 (78%) | 1–4 (20%) | 103.5 | +0.51 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1790 | 144.2 | +1.46 | +3.03 | 1.134 | 52.5% | +30 | +81 | -29 | 55.7% | +0.70 | 7–9 (44%) | 4–5 (44%) | 94.2 | +1.98 | 2021 | 1808 | 137.8 | +1.20 | +2.65 | 1.098 | 51.8% | -16 | +24 | — | 57.9% | +0.66 | 9–12 (43%) | 7–4 (64%) | 96.3 | +0.54 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1819 | 147.2 | +0.37 | +2.82 | 1.081 | 51.6% | +29 | +20 | -94 | 56.6% | +0.57 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–3 (70%) | 100.3 | -0.17 | 2022 | 1741 | 133.0 | +0.13 | +0.85 | 1.028 | 50.6% | -18 | +116 | -198 | 48.8% | +0.07 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–1 (75%) | 102.9 | +0.49 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1789 | 149.2 | +1.83 | +1.03 | 1.051 | 50.7% | +1 | +82 | -81 | 54.0% | +0.28 | 8–9 (47%) | 1–5 (17%) | 96.0 | -1.04 | 2023 | 1749 | 136.8 | -0.38 | +1.09 | 1.031 | 50.7% | 0 | +59 | — | 52.5% | +0.28 | 7–10 (41%) | 7–10 (41%) | 95.4 | -0.65 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1868 | 154.5 | +3.20 | +1.74 | 1.111 | 52.0% | -33 | +15 | +56 | 63.0% | +0.89 | 7–10 (41%) | 10–7 (59%) | 98.4 | -1.15 | 2024 | 1934 | 154.1 | +2.34 | +3.48 | 1.129 | 52.6% | -78 | -30 | -86 | 61.2% | +0.84 | 13–8 (62%) | 7–6 (54%) | 106.6 | -2.42 |
| 30 | 2026 | 1890 | 152.2 | +2.95 | +1.93 | 1.109 | 51.9% | -25 | -21 | +83 | 57.0% | +0.64 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.3 | +1.05 | 2025 | 1741 | 136.3 | -1.20 | -2.42 | 0.889 | 47.5% | +19 | +85 | -28 | 37.8% | -0.66 | 4–4 (50%) | 6–9 (40%) | 96.6 | +0.57 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1811 | 142.0 | -1.67 | +1.45 | 0.976 | 49.3% | +32 | +11 | — | 46.5% | -0.24 | 8–8 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | 99.0 | -2.23 |
| Career | — | 2000 | 154.4 | +2.07 | +2.80 | 1.115 | 52.2% | +3 | +19 | -22 | 59.2% | +0.77 | 84–80 (51%) | 59–58 (50%) | 99.2 | +0.06 | — | 1991 | 141.6 | -0.17 | +1.30 | 1.016 | 50.3% | -19 | +64 | -109 | 49.3% | 0.00 | 91–89 (51%) | 66–71 (48%) | 99.8 | -0.65 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 2 | 11 | 13 | Jul 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 4 | 7 | 11 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jul 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jul 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 10, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 6 | 2 | 8 | Aug 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jan 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Sloane Stephens | 5 | 3 | 8 | May 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 23, 2023 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 1 | 6 | 7 | Apr 5, 2023 | H2H |