H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 4–2 lead over Anett Kontaveit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2021 WTA Finals final 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-3 7-5 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data | Nov 17, 2021* | F | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | Hard |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-4 6-4 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data | Nov 10, 2021 | RR | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | Hard |
| Anett Kontaveit | 6-1 6-1 | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data | Oct 23, 2021* | QF | Moscow | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data | Jun 1, 2017* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Anett Kontaveit | 2-6 7-6(1) 6-1 | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data | Apr 28, 2017* | R16 | Porsche Tennis Grand Prix | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-0 6-4 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data | Jan 20, 2016* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,061 | 312 | 182 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,114 | 205 | 140 | 59.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Garbiñe Muguruza | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,954 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #7 | 1,842 | 1 | 3 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #2 | 1,935 | 2 | 5 | 2019 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #36 | 1,817 | 2 | 7 | 2021 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,058 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,941 | 2 | 7 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,886 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2021 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #3 | 2,005 | 2 | 10 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,779 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,777 | 2 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,724 | 2 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Garbiñe Muguruza | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2014 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 2013 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2015 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 2014 | 27 | 16 | 43 | 62.8% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2016 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 21 | 2015 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2017 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% |
| 22 | 2016 | 18 | 15 | 33 | 54.5% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2018 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 23 | 2017 | 30 | 14 | 44 | 68.2% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 2019 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2018 | 27 | 14 | 41 | 65.9% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2020 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2021 | 40 | 13 | 53 | 75.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 2020 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2021 | 38 | 12 | 50 | 76.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2023 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 2022 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 219 | 124 | 343 | 63.8% | 62 | 38 | 100 | 62.0% | 31 | 20 | 51 | 60.8% | — | 139 | 91 | 230 | 60.4% | 46 | 33 | 79 | 58.2% | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 434/494 of Garbiñe Muguruza's and 327/346 of Anett Kontaveit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Garbiñe Muguruza | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 60.7% | 43.2% | 37.5% | 53.8% | 100.0% | 41.0% | 34.2% |
| 18 | 2012 | 12/14 | 1.7 | 5.8 | 58.7% | 55.7% | 40.6% | 38.4% | 43.8% | 49.2% | 46.3% | 2014 | 5/6 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 60.9% | 61.7% | 40.9% | 41.7% | 44.7% | 53.1% | 43.9% |
| 19 | 2013 | 25/26 | 2.4 | 5.1 | 59.7% | 63.8% | 48.4% | 55.1% | 47.6% | 57.6% | 41.8% | 2015 | 5/11 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 57.9% | 51.5% | 44.8% | 28.1% | 34.6% | 48.4% | 40.1% |
| 20 | 2014 | 50/60 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 60.6% | 64.0% | 46.6% | 55.5% | 50.0% | 57.3% | 46.8% | 2016 | 29/30 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 58.9% | 66.1% | 45.4% | 54.5% | 51.5% | 57.6% | 42.4% |
| 21 | 2015 | 41/58 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 59.1% | 70.4% | 50.5% | 53.0% | 50.5% | 62.0% | 44.0% | 2017 | 45/45 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 64.0% | 68.8% | 48.4% | 54.2% | 44.0% | 61.4% | 44.3% |
| 22 | 2016 | 42/51 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 60.9% | 70.6% | 47.4% | 60.1% | 52.9% | 61.4% | 45.6% | 2018 | 55/56 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 62.3% | 63.8% | 46.6% | 57.8% | 51.1% | 57.4% | 44.9% |
| 23 | 2017 | 58/66 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 64.8% | 66.3% | 48.9% | 57.3% | 53.0% | 59.9% | 46.0% | 2019 | 38/42 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 63.1% | 66.8% | 48.3% | 61.3% | 45.3% | 59.5% | 43.2% |
| 24 | 2018 | 53/56 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 65.2% | 67.6% | 47.7% | 57.7% | 48.8% | 60.7% | 47.2% | 2020 | 31/31 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 62.2% | 67.6% | 48.2% | 53.1% | 53.1% | 60.2% | 45.4% |
| 25 | 2019 | 36/37 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 64.0% | 64.2% | 47.7% | 59.0% | 52.9% | 58.4% | 44.5% | 2021 | 61/67 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 60.7% | 69.7% | 50.2% | 56.4% | 53.2% | 62.2% | 45.8% |
| 26 | 2020 | 30/31 | 5.3 | 3.5 | 64.2% | 70.5% | 46.0% | 57.2% | 45.6% | 61.3% | 45.4% | 2022 | 45/45 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 63.2% | 66.5% | 47.4% | 54.5% | 47.5% | 59.6% | 44.4% |
| 27 | 2021 | 54/62 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 65.4% | 68.6% | 49.7% | 58.0% | 48.0% | 62.1% | 47.6% | 2023 | 12/12 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 62.4% | 64.4% | 43.0% | 46.1% | 37.2% | 56.3% | 40.1% |
| 28 | 2022 | 29/29 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 62.8% | 65.1% | 43.9% | 52.2% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 4/4 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 60.2% | 63.4% | 44.0% | 32.4% | 53.2% | 55.6% | 34.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 434/494 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 62.8% | 66.9% | 47.7% | 56.0% | 50.1% | 59.7% | 45.3% | — | 327/346 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 62.0% | 66.6% | 47.6% | 55.1% | 48.9% | 59.4% | 44.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Garbiñe Muguruza | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1491 | 98.3 | -2.83 | -0.54 | 0.580 | 38.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 18 | 2012 | 1544 | 125.0 | -2.60 | +1.47 | 0.911 | 47.7% | +21 | +39 | — | 41.9% | -1.00 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.84 | 2014 | 1466 | 100.3 | -0.85 | +0.51 | 0.936 | 48.5% | — | +74 | — | 28.6% | -1.21 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | -0.11 |
| 19 | 2013 | 1668 | 132.8 | +1.86 | -0.67 | 0.985 | 49.8% | +14 | -103 | -50 | 50.0% | 0.00 | 8–4 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | 108.1 | -0.45 | 2015 | 1517 | 109.4 | -3.04 | -1.00 | 0.776 | 44.4% | +23 | — | — | 45.8% | -0.63 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.14 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1825 | 147.6 | +1.31 | +2.74 | 1.098 | 52.1% | 0 | -119 | -189 | 60.6% | +0.77 | 14–12 (54%) | 8–10 (44%) | 100.4 | +1.40 | 2016 | 1607 | 127.5 | +1.62 | -0.14 | 1.002 | 50.4% | -2 | -120 | -30 | 50.0% | +0.26 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–7 (30%) | 93.8 | -2.22 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1955 | 154.4 | +4.18 | +3.29 | 1.158 | 52.8% | -22 | -210 | -174 | 64.0% | +1.17 | 15–9 (63%) | 6–7 (46%) | 104.4 | -0.93 | 2017 | 1706 | 137.6 | +4.48 | +1.12 | 1.147 | 52.5% | -91 | +30 | +30 | 56.2% | +0.75 | 8–7 (53%) | 7–9 (44%) | 101.7 | -0.81 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1843 | 151.6 | +4.62 | +2.60 | 1.182 | 53.4% | -21 | +95 | -105 | 62.0% | +0.95 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–8 (27%) | 96.5 | +0.58 | 2018 | 1837 | 141.9 | +0.78 | +2.24 | 1.053 | 51.3% | -76 | +49 | -138 | 53.4% | +0.30 | 15–8 (65%) | 10–5 (67%) | 110.5 | +1.22 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1936 | 156.1 | +3.62 | +3.80 | 1.147 | 52.7% | -31 | +10 | +25 | 67.1% | +1.16 | 15–6 (71%) | 4–7 (36%) | 102.0 | +0.32 | 2019 | 1876 | 145.7 | +2.85 | +1.08 | 1.066 | 51.5% | +36 | -18 | -176 | 51.8% | +0.09 | 9–4 (69%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | -0.95 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1842 | 150.6 | +3.92 | +3.48 | 1.201 | 53.7% | +21 | +112 | +57 | 64.1% | +1.15 | 6–9 (40%) | 4–7 (36%) | 90.5 | +1.77 | 2020 | 1871 | 153.1 | +2.99 | +1.93 | 1.143 | 52.9% | +44 | -8 | — | 61.6% | +1.01 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.9 | +0.31 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1817 | 147.5 | +1.58 | +1.77 | 1.069 | 51.5% | +43 | +148 | — | 59.5% | +0.59 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–7 (36%) | 95.2 | -0.88 | 2021 | 2058 | 162.0 | +5.54 | +3.36 | 1.211 | 54.0% | +27 | -175 | -286 | 69.2% | +1.24 | 10–7 (59%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.7 | -1.91 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1942 | 154.8 | +3.52 | +2.81 | 1.175 | 53.2% | +5 | +66 | — | 68.0% | +0.99 | 10–5 (67%) | 7–0 (100%) | 107.2 | -1.07 | 2022 | 1886 | 151.2 | +2.51 | +1.53 | 1.100 | 52.0% | +86 | +5 | — | 61.2% | +0.68 | 8–6 (57%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.1 | +0.40 |
| 27 | 2021 | 2005 | 165.3 | +5.49 | +5.23 | 1.258 | 54.6% | +43 | -24 | -63 | 69.7% | +1.39 | 8–8 (50%) | 6–5 (55%) | 98.7 | -1.39 | 2023 | 1779 | 114.3 | -0.99 | -1.11 | 0.919 | 48.2% | +118 | +17 | — | 40.0% | -0.68 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.10 |
| 28 | 2022 | 1777 | 136.0 | +0.43 | -1.32 | 0.949 | 49.1% | +119 | +89 | +63 | 47.6% | -0.13 | 1–6 (14%) | 5–3 (63%) | 93.1 | +1.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 1725 | 118.4 | -0.07 | -0.78 | 0.766 | 44.7% | +101 | — | — | 20.0% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | -0.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2062 | 158.1 | +3.08 | +2.71 | 1.124 | 52.4% | +13 | +6 | -55 | 61.6% | +0.84 | 91–76 (54%) | 52–58 (47%) | 97.0 | -0.13 | — | 2114 | 150.2 | +2.78 | +1.61 | 1.089 | 51.8% | +11 | -6 | -112 | 56.8% | +0.53 | 61–49 (55%) | 42–39 (52%) | 103.2 | -1.15 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | 3 | 8 | 11 | May 14, 2021 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 2 | 8 | 10 | Nov 10, 2021 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 5 | 3 | 8 | Jul 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 4 | 4 | 8 | Oct 26, 2016 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 1 | 6 | 7 | Sep 4, 2022 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sakkari | 6 | 5 | 11 | Feb 13, 2022 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 25, 2021 | H2H |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 10, 2021 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 5 | 1 | 6 | Apr 21, 2022 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 19, 2022 | H2H |