H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Garbiñe Muguruza vs Johanna Konta H2H: 2-2
Garbiñe Muguruza and Johanna Konta are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Garbiñe Muguruza leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2020 Rome fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2020* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-4 6-1 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-4 6-7(3) 7-5 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Johanna Konta | 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-2 | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2015* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Johanna Konta | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Garbiñe Muguruza | Johanna Konta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |