H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Garbiñe Muguruza vs Yingying Duan H2H: 2-0
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 2–0 lead over Yingying Duan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2018 Doha third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2018* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-3 6-4 | Yingying Duan | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-4 6-0 | Yingying Duan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Garbiñe Muguruza | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 | 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |