H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC
Heather Watson vs Qiang Wang H2H: 2-0
Heather Watson holds a 2–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Heather Watson leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Heather Watson won the 2022 Wimbledon second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Heather Watson | 7-5 6-4 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2019* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Heather Watson | 6-3 6-0 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heather Watson | #470 | #38 | 1,386 | 1,755 | 144 | 195 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Heather Watson | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #92 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #49 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #121 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #49 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #76 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #73 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #91 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #269 | 1,545 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |