H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Jana Fett vs Ashleigh Barty H2H: 0-1
Ashleigh Barty holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Fett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ashleigh Barty leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2017 Nottingham fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 29
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2017* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Ashleigh Barty | 6-2 6-1 | Jana Fett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Fett | #415 | #97 | 685 | 1,678 | 25 | 39 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,199 | 191 | 70 | 73.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Fett | Ashleigh Barty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #103 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #208 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,070 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #237 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,082 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 43–7 | 86.0% | #1 | 2,142 | 2 | 13 |
| 26 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 15 |
| 27 | 2024 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #189 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |