H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Jana Fett vs Fiona Ferro H2H: 0-1
Fiona Ferro holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Fett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fiona Ferro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fiona Ferro won the 2018 Tashkent third round 1-6 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 29
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2019 | Bronx | WTA 250 | Q2 | Hard | Fiona Ferro | 6-4 6-0 | Jana Fett | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2018* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Fiona Ferro | 1-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | Jana Fett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Fett | #415 | #97 | 685 | 1,678 | 25 | 39 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fiona Ferro | #189 | #39 | 1,649 | 1,799 | 55 | 72 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Fett | Fiona Ferro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #345 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #103 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #208 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #102 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #42 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #237 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #103 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #411 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #189 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #366 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 |