H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 04:32 UTC
Jelena Ostapenko vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-2
Qiang Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Ostapenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Beijing third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2018 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-0 6-0 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2017* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 7-6(1) 6-2 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jelena Ostapenko | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |