H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jelena Ostapenko vs Shelby Rogers H2H: 3-2

Jelena Ostapenko holds a 3–2 lead over Shelby Rogers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Shelby Rogers leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jelena Ostapenko leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Shelby Rogers won the 2022 Miami Open second round 6-3 7-6(0).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Ostapenko
Latvia Age 29 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Shelby Rogers
United States Age 33 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shelby Rogers #48 6-3 7-6(0) Jelena Ostapenko #12 Match data Mar 25, 2022* R64 Miami Open WTA 1000 Hard
Shelby Rogers #49 7-5 7-6(7) Jelena Ostapenko #12 Match data Mar 12, 2022* R64 Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Jelena Ostapenko #29 6-4 4-6 6-3 Shelby Rogers #44 Match data Oct 15, 2021* QF Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Jelena Ostapenko #31 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) Shelby Rogers Match data Apr 4, 2019* R32 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Jelena Ostapenko #50 6-3 6-4 Shelby Rogers #51 Match data May 17, 2017* R64 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Ostapenko #32 #5 5,611 2,022 293 219 57.2% 1 0 0 5 3 9
Shelby Rogers #437 #30 1,698 1,855 126 140 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Shelby Rogers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2014 1–1 50.0% #271 1,505 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #352 1,494 0 0
18 2015 6–5 54.5% #84 1,563 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #426 1,479 0 0
19 2016 20–24 45.5% #44 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2017 43–20 68.3% #7 1,904 1 2 2013 2–3 40.0% #126 1,478 0 0
21 2018 23–21 52.3% #22 1,764 1 2 2014 12–9 57.1% #72 1,630 0 0
22 2019 25–26 49.0% #45 1,796 1 3 2015 4–14 22.2% #151 1,527 0 0
23 2020 8–7 53.3% #44 1,794 1 3 2016 13–15 46.4% #59 1,585 0 0
24 2021 31–19 62.0% #28 1,885 1 4 2017 23–19 54.8% #59 1,689 0 0
25 2022 31–19 62.0% #18 1,842 1 5 2018 0–2 0.0% #630 1,650 0 0
26 2023 38–22 63.3% #13 1,904 1 6 2019 3–9 25.0% #177 1,574 0 0
27 2024 29–18 61.7% #15 1,821 1 8 2020 8–6 57.1% #60 1,679 0 0
28 2025 17–19 47.2% #23 1,768 1 9 2021 28–21 57.1% #40 1,804 0 0
29 2026 21–18 53.8% #32 1,806 1 9 2022 20–19 51.3% #47 1,804 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2023 9–13 40.9% #149 1,773 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2024 4–8 33.3% #341 1,675 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Shelby Rogers
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2015 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 22 14 36 61.1% 16 4 20 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 2014 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
22 2019 18 16 34 52.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2015 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2020 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2021 18 13 31 58.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2017 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2022 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2023 23 16 39 59.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2024 18 10 28 64.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2020 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2025 8 14 22 36.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 20 12 32 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 2026 9 11 20 45.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2022 14 11 25 56.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 6 7 13 46.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
Career — 174 147 321 54.2% 63 47 110 57.3% 56 25 81 69.1% — 77 82 159 48.4% 38 40 78 48.7% 11 18 29 37.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 477/514 of Jelena Ostapenko's and 252/266 of Shelby Rogers's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Shelby Rogers
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2014 2/2 2.5 7.5 50.3% 64.2% 40.8% 59.2% 46.9% 52.5% 47.0% 2010 1/1 2.0 9.0 49.2% 68.9% 41.3% 60.0% 60.0% 54.8% 35.5%
18 2015 4/11 2.3 8.8 51.3% 68.6% 37.4% 46.0% 55.6% 53.2% 42.9% 2011 1/1 3.0 4.0 51.7% 54.8% 51.7% 37.5% 22.2% 53.3% 36.7%
19 2016 41/44 3.2 6.0 55.9% 63.9% 44.3% 46.5% 47.3% 55.3% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 57/63 3.0 6.0 52.4% 66.3% 44.4% 52.2% 49.7% 55.7% 47.9% 2013 3/5 4.0 1.3 62.8% 67.6% 53.3% 59.4% 27.8% 62.3% 34.2%
21 2018 41/44 3.2 6.0 53.7% 62.2% 43.2% 44.4% 53.4% 53.9% 45.0% 2014 20/21 3.3 3.5 59.4% 66.1% 43.5% 47.9% 39.3% 57.1% 42.8%
22 2019 50/51 2.6 8.5 54.2% 65.5% 40.4% 49.4% 49.8% 53.8% 44.9% 2015 13/18 1.8 4.1 61.1% 58.1% 48.5% 48.5% 41.6% 54.1% 35.9%
23 2020 15/15 2.1 6.7 56.0% 63.0% 42.4% 52.5% 56.4% 54.3% 47.8% 2016 25/28 3.5 3.0 59.2% 65.0% 50.8% 53.1% 54.6% 59.3% 43.0%
24 2021 48/50 2.3 4.9 59.2% 65.5% 44.8% 47.2% 51.4% 57.3% 47.9% 2017 40/42 3.4 2.5 61.9% 65.3% 49.1% 54.4% 51.6% 59.1% 41.4%
25 2022 50/50 3.3 4.5 58.7% 65.7% 46.0% 51.8% 50.2% 57.5% 45.7% 2018 2/2 5.0 5.0 57.9% 60.1% 48.5% 36.8% 57.7% 55.1% 40.1%
26 2023 59/60 3.9 4.8 57.7% 67.9% 44.8% 53.0% 51.2% 58.0% 45.4% 2019 12/12 4.9 3.4 58.6% 62.2% 47.5% 50.8% 52.1% 56.2% 43.6%
27 2024 46/47 4.2 5.5 58.2% 67.2% 44.3% 53.9% 47.3% 57.6% 44.9% 2020 14/14 4.2 2.6 60.1% 67.3% 48.7% 55.8% 53.6% 59.4% 39.3%
28 2025 26/38 3.8 6.3 56.3% 64.1% 42.6% 45.4% 52.0% 54.8% 44.0% 2021 49/49 4.0 2.4 62.3% 67.1% 50.2% 54.5% 49.2% 60.6% 43.8%
29 2026 38/39 3.6 5.9 57.5% 68.9% 39.9% 53.8% 55.6% 56.7% 44.6% 2022 38/39 4.3 3.0 60.1% 67.1% 49.9% 58.3% 49.5% 60.2% 40.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 22/22 3.7 2.9 60.1% 68.2% 45.8% 55.2% 50.0% 59.0% 39.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 12/12 2.2 2.3 58.0% 64.8% 47.7% 51.0% 41.6% 57.3% 40.4%
Career — 477/514 3.2 5.9 56.3% 65.8% 43.5% 50.2% 50.8% 56.1% 45.9% — 252/266 3.7 2.9 60.5% 65.7% 48.7% 53.7% 48.8% 58.9% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Ostapenko Shelby Rogers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2014 1506 102.9 -0.95 -1.08 0.989 49.6% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.07 2010 1494 105.0 +0.17 +0.58 0.785 45.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
18 2015 1564 113.6 -0.38 -0.84 0.917 48.0% +1 — — 51.9% +0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.31 2011 1479 95.8 -4.03 -4.58 0.787 43.9% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.08
19 2016 1587 129.6 -0.26 +3.66 1.052 51.1% -18 -56 +58 47.0% -0.01 5–9 (36%) 6–2 (75%) 100.1 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 1905 140.7 -0.06 +4.38 1.081 51.7% -121 -14 -156 61.0% +0.69 19–7 (73%) 8–7 (53%) 113.0 -0.70 2013 1478 105.2 +0.56 -2.93 0.907 49.1% — +62 — 50.0% +0.17 0–2 — — +0.53
21 2018 1765 135.8 -1.97 +1.80 0.976 49.4% -46 +60 +98 52.5% -0.15 5–6 (45%) 11–3 (79%) 104.3 +1.89 2014 1631 132.2 +1.08 -0.03 0.997 49.8% -30 -7 — 53.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -0.57
22 2019 1797 138.3 -2.06 +2.13 0.973 49.4% -6 -63 +57 49.5% -0.12 10–7 (59%) 6–2 (75%) 105.6 +0.41 2015 1528 107.8 -2.17 -3.76 0.783 44.7% +11 +55 — 28.2% -1.67 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.8 -0.14
23 2020 1795 129.8 -1.03 +3.31 1.046 51.1% -14 -42 — 50.0% +0.33 1–1 0–2 — -0.12 2016 1585 127.2 +2.25 +0.12 1.057 51.1% -39 +110 — 49.3% +0.09 5–8 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 97.4 +0.44
24 2021 1886 145.5 +0.96 +4.80 1.122 52.4% -58 -102 +128 60.3% +0.78 10–10 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.7 -0.11 2017 1689 133.0 +2.26 -1.35 1.011 50.1% -50 +54 -96 52.0% +0.14 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 108.3 -1.20
25 2022 1842 151.3 +0.61 +3.32 1.076 51.7% +25 -134 +215 56.9% +0.71 12–8 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 +0.07 2018 1650 103.6 -2.39 -1.26 0.893 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–2 — +0.21
26 2023 1905 154.5 +1.65 +2.98 1.082 51.8% -12 -121 +196 58.2% +0.74 19–11 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 106.0 -0.43 2019 1574 111.3 -0.80 -0.46 0.996 50.1% — +121 +52 44.8% -0.31 0–7 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.20
27 2024 1821 149.7 +0.73 +1.92 1.057 51.4% +46 -10 +294 58.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.64 2020 1680 132.2 +1.94 -0.55 0.967 49.3% +16 — — 51.5% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.2 +0.47
28 2025 1769 150.6 -1.17 +1.25 0.972 49.2% -34 +155 — 45.8% +0.11 7–4 (64%) 2–5 (29%) 99.3 +0.73 2021 1805 147.1 +3.43 +1.34 1.111 52.0% +24 -149 -144 57.1% +0.48 6–10 (38%) 8–6 (57%) 96.6 -0.42
29 2026 1807 143.7 -0.48 +1.17 1.030 50.5% -68 +101 +265 54.9% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 2–3 (40%) 98.1 +2.03 2022 1804 144.1 +2.94 -1.21 1.009 50.3% +44 -170 -145 52.2% -0.08 6–10 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 99.2 -1.95
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1773 137.9 +1.67 -1.25 0.951 49.1% +77 -140 — 42.6% -0.41 5–7 (42%) 0–6 (0%) 92.1 -1.29
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1676 122.2 -0.04 -0.79 0.948 48.6% +36 -21 — 32.0% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.39
Career — 2022 149.7 -0.12 +2.85 1.045 51.0% -27 -7 +135 54.9% +0.40 107–78 (58%) 60–44 (58%) 108.9 +1.22 — 1856 140.0 +1.85 -0.58 1.004 50.0% +8 -8 -100 48.9% -0.10 41–61 (40%) 39–36 (52%) 94.4 -1.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.